Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat memos on judicial nominations online!!!
Coalition for a Fair Judiciary ^ | ConservativeGadfly

Posted on 11/18/2003 10:51:26 AM PST by ConservativeGadfly

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last
To: Dog
You offered (wisely, perhaps presciently), "Don't be suprised if this isn't the last leak." I'm convinced that there are at least two things driving these leaks of dem strategery and dem corrupted functioning as 'legislators': 1) the clintons are akeeping things stirred up in the DNC which their McAwful doll is still trying to direct for hatellary's benefit, long term; 2) there are faithful democrats who detest the corruption of the once great party of liberal causes ... the clintonization of the democrat party has thoroughly corrupted the representation nature of the party into the oligarchy of the democrats, a most pernicious and deadly mutation for the party's survival.

The leadership of the democrat party are a distant shadow of patriotic AMericans, a close cousin now to the totalitarians and societal engineers of the last century. Is there that much difference in the Islamicists and the current democrat party leadership? Both are firmly committed to the ends justify the means!

81 posted on 11/18/2003 12:40:00 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
I just FINALLY got it to download on my hardrive

And I get the feeling, what is realy going on is a lot worse then what is in these memos
82 posted on 11/18/2003 12:40:15 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Too little, too late . . . for Miguel Estrada.
83 posted on 11/18/2003 12:40:29 PM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
People for the American Way.
84 posted on 11/18/2003 12:40:55 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
bmp
85 posted on 11/18/2003 12:43:47 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Ahhhhh
86 posted on 11/18/2003 12:45:48 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
More appropriately known as People for the Un American Way. Ralph Neas & co.
87 posted on 11/18/2003 12:52:15 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly; All
It looks like the last two pages came from someone whose username is Manuel Miranda. Look at the bottom of pages 29 and 30.
88 posted on 11/18/2003 12:52:17 PM PST by The Chid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
I have a question. ive only read a portion of this memo its taking forever!! now that the memo has been exposed do the people have a remedy? can this memo be used in a construtive way to put an end to all this ? these senators are all terrible and the way they've been treating the nominee's is way,way , over the top,and shows me how over the line they have gone and they must be stopped.
89 posted on 11/18/2003 12:52:26 PM PST by suzyq5558 (LIBERAL'S are irational. which means they are certifiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly

It seems that he is not the only leaker growing a conscience. Who leaked the other memo to Sean Hannity , the national security one?
This is very good news.
90 posted on 11/18/2003 12:56:29 PM PST by georgia peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
I quickly glanced at the pdf file. There is some damning evidence here. At the very least, this justifies recess appointments.

I'm a little uncomfortable that the name Kennedy was handwritten in on several of the memos. Is there a chance that some or all of this was planted by the dems?
91 posted on 11/18/2003 12:57:17 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: The Chid
whose username is Manuel Miranda.

as in warning?

92 posted on 11/18/2003 12:58:09 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
HMMMM... on page eleven there talking about Durbin getting caught up to speed since he couldnt meet with them in thier secret hidaway????? so there's a secert hangout huh? where in the gutters under the city of Gotham????
93 posted on 11/18/2003 12:58:18 PM PST by suzyq5558 (LIBERAL'S are irational. which means they are certifiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: suzyq5558
There are certainly a couple of options on the table.

First, I think an investigation is in order. Sen. Sessions heads up the Courts subcommittee on the Senate Judiciary Committee and I think that at the very least, the Sixth Circuit nominee situation should be investiaged to see if, in fact, cases were pushed through (and nominees were delayed) to fulfill a specific agenda.

Second, regarding the issue of judicial nominations as a whole, I think a starting point is Frist-Miller, which would change the cloture vote requirement so that nominees could actually get to an up or down vote. But that too, unfortunately, would be filibustered.

Third, there is the nuclear option which would actually change parlimentary procedure. But the Republicans are about 5 votes short (Collins, Chafee, Snowe, McCain and Nickles).

So what the Coalition for a Fair Judiciary is going to do is go out into the states and challenge Senate candidates to actually take an oath to support a fair and simple up or down for for all nominees -- called the Fair Judiciary Oath. Should be launched soon. It will provide voters with an opportunity to see who the obstructionists would be once elected and who embraces the Constitution.
94 posted on 11/18/2003 1:01:26 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: suzyq5558
Every Senator has an office -- separate and apart from the office that houses staff -- in the basement of the Capitol somewhere that they call the "hideaways." Very small, but places to hold quiet meetings right off the floor, place phone calls or just rest and not be bugged by staff all the time. Most staffers don't even know where their boss' hideaways are.
95 posted on 11/18/2003 1:04:32 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: txflake
No, but...

Yipe!

Bill Frist has an aide by that name...

Click Here

96 posted on 11/18/2003 1:05:34 PM PST by The Chid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: txflake
No, but...

Yipe!

Bill Frist has an aide by that name...

Click Here

Goofed it!

97 posted on 11/18/2003 1:08:28 PM PST by The Chid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: The Chid
Manuel Miranda, judicial counsel to Majority Leader Frist

From: Senate Republican Conference Radio Clips

98 posted on 11/18/2003 1:09:08 PM PST by StriperSniper (The "mainstream" media is a left bank oxbow lake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: suzyq5558
on page eleven there talking about Durbin getting caught up to speed since he couldnt meet with them in thier secret hidaway?????

"Hideaway" is Senate vernacular for the Senators' little cubbyhole offices over in the Capitol Building. Once upon a time, the Capitol Building housed the entire House, entire Senate, their (tiny) staffs, the Supreme Court, and the Library of Congress. That's why it is so big. There were no other congressional office buildings on the Hill.

Gradually everybody moved across the street to the various Capitol complex buildings. That left empty space in the Capitol itself, which tended to fill up with the ever-growing staff. The Senators decided to allocate a chunk of the space on their side to private little hidey-holes where they can get away from the hustle and bustle. Rather a good idea, IMHO; ranting aside, the time and people pressures on these guys is excessive.

The House doesn't have hideaways because there is no way to make room for all 435 of them, although various ranking types do have offices in the Capitol.

99 posted on 11/18/2003 1:09:16 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
I presume these memos were all obtained thru legal means - no hacking of computers or anything nefarious like that.

Which begs the question: if these were secret memos stored on a restricted computer, then how would Republicans know of their existence in order to steal them in the first place?

It's probably a disgruntled or disillusioned Democrat staffer.

-PJ

100 posted on 11/18/2003 1:10:37 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson