[Question_Assumptions]

Are we reading the same reply that everyone else on this tread is reading?

[Still Thinking]

I think the thing that has us all riled is that the software's default policy on gun sites is different from its policy on anti-freedom sites. If they read the minds of their customers sufficiently to determine that gun sites might be objectionable, shouldn't they also have been able to deduce that with regard to sites that propose a reduction in the amount of liberty we are "allowed"? By making one choice the default on one side of an argument and the opposite choice the default on the other side of the argument, it seems they are either intentionally taking a position, or revealing their unconscious prejudices.