Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

An interesting bit of history. Generals used to be fairly potent cadidates. Now, we seem to consistantly favor governors.
1 posted on 11/19/2003 7:54:05 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: .cnI redruM
The Perfumed Prince is an idiot. The Generals he worked with won't even get into why they are against his candidacy.
2 posted on 11/19/2003 8:10:14 AM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: .cnI redruM
Eisenhower was a politician general who sought consensus. MacArthur was a great stategist and tactician, but he lacked the skills of buttering people up. It was his way or nothing.

Washington was an all-around genius. Andy Jackson was what was needed at a particular time in history. Otherwise, most generals who became presidents were not notably good. U. S. Grant is the most famous instance of a great general who was a bad president.

Wesley Clark wasn't even a competent general. He was a perfumed prince who rose high because he was eager to do anything to earn the support of a corrupt president.
3 posted on 11/19/2003 9:04:59 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson