An interesting bit of history. Generals used to be fairly potent cadidates. Now, we seem to consistantly favor governors.
To: .cnI redruM
The Perfumed Prince is an idiot. The Generals he worked with won't even get into why they are against his candidacy.
2 posted on
11/19/2003 8:10:14 AM PST by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: .cnI redruM
Eisenhower was a politician general who sought consensus. MacArthur was a great stategist and tactician, but he lacked the skills of buttering people up. It was his way or nothing.
Washington was an all-around genius. Andy Jackson was what was needed at a particular time in history. Otherwise, most generals who became presidents were not notably good. U. S. Grant is the most famous instance of a great general who was a bad president.
Wesley Clark wasn't even a competent general. He was a perfumed prince who rose high because he was eager to do anything to earn the support of a corrupt president.
3 posted on
11/19/2003 9:04:59 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson