Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hybrid Car Ranked Best For 2004 (Look out, OPEC!)
AP ^ | 11-20-03

Posted on 11/20/2003 12:26:20 PM PST by steppenwolffe

DETROIT -- The world's first commercially mass-produced hybrid car has claimed the honor of 2004 Car of the Year from Motor Trend magazine.

What helped drive the Toyota Prius to become Motor Trend magazine's 2004 Car of the Year? Great fuel economy -- up to 60 miles a gallon in the city.

Editor-in-chief Kevin Smith describes the Prius as "a capable, comfortable, fun-to-drive car that just happens to get spectacular fuel economy."

The newest version of the Toyota Prius, introduced in 1997, beat out 26 new or significantly reengineered models from car makers like Acura, BMW, Cadillac and Volkswagen.

The magazine said the Prius is spacious enough to be classified as a mid-size sedan, and has a base price of about $20,000.

The newly designed Prius hit U.S. showrooms in October.

A hybrid car switches between a gasoline or diesel engine and an electric motor to deliver the best mileage. The car recharges itself during the drive.

For now, the only hybrid versions available in the United States are small cars made by Toyota and Honda. But several major automakers have models in the works, including trucks and sport utility vehicles.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: auto; energy; environment; hybrid; hybridauto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2003 12:26:21 PM PST by steppenwolffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe
Prius, Ugly and Slow. For those who hate themsleves, and hate life. Private Transportation, For Liberals.
2 posted on 11/20/2003 12:28:05 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe
Is 'car of the year' awarded to the manufacturer who pays motor trend the most for the "award?"
3 posted on 11/20/2003 12:28:39 PM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe
Wait until you have to replace the battery (3k to replace)
4 posted on 11/20/2003 12:28:48 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe

5 posted on 11/20/2003 12:30:16 PM PST by NautiNurse (Everyone is born right handed. Only the exceptionally gifted overcome it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
What an BUGLY piece of crap!
6 posted on 11/20/2003 12:37:01 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid
Wait until you have to replace the battery (3k to replace)

I would rather pay for a new $3000.00 battery than give $3.00 to the Saudi's for gas to run my current car.

7 posted on 11/20/2003 12:38:39 PM PST by jsbankston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid
My thoughts exactly...

If they didn't look like a danged suppository I'd even consider buying one.

Fugly is more like it...
8 posted on 11/20/2003 12:40:28 PM PST by jamz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
What's the 0-60 like? 20 seconds?
9 posted on 11/20/2003 12:40:40 PM PST by BrooklynGOP (www.logicandsanity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe
Cool, bump.
10 posted on 11/20/2003 12:41:40 PM PST by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
I work for the company that publishes Motor Trend. The answer is no.
11 posted on 11/20/2003 12:45:42 PM PST by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
Actually, they have a decent 0-60 because I think they can use both the gas and electric motors at the same time along with a constant velocity transmission for quicker acceleration. Edmunds rates them at a 12.8 second 0-60 and a 19.3 second quarter mile at about 75 mph.
12 posted on 11/20/2003 12:45:47 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
Correction. The 12.8 seconds was a 2001 Prius. The new one does 0-60 in around 10.5 seconds.
13 posted on 11/20/2003 12:49:19 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
Edmunds rates them at a 12.8 second 0-60 and a 19.3 second quarter mile at about 75 mph.

Ack! Still way too slow for me.

14 posted on 11/20/2003 12:50:29 PM PST by BrooklynGOP (www.logicandsanity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid
Wait until you have to replace the battery (3k to replace)

My thoughts exactly. I've actually heard a figure higher than that (closer to $5K altogether with installation, etc). So all that money you saved over the life of that car ends up going towards an expensive battery. Supposedly, the battery is expected to last 8-10 years before requiring replacement, based on what I've read. So if it doesn't end up affecting you (you only keep the car 5 or 6 years), it may still affect the resale value. What would you pay for a used Prius you know would possibly need a brand new $3k-$5k part in two or three years?

To be fair though, most of the people I know who own own or have driven like it. It's no performance machine, but some of them say it's unusual to visit the gas station more than once during a two week period if that.

15 posted on 11/20/2003 12:51:22 PM PST by sirshackleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jsbankston
I would rather wait for the new 25mpg Corvette!
16 posted on 11/20/2003 12:52:03 PM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steppenwolffe
There are probably only 3 mechanics in the country that can work on the damn things and the parts have got to be astronomical in price.
17 posted on 11/20/2003 12:53:41 PM PST by richtig_faust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsbankston
jsbankston wrote:

I would rather pay for a new $3000.00 battery than give $3.00 to the Saudi's for gas to run my current car.

************************

Amen.

I see this as a "good first step".

If only it were American, I'd want one!

I'll wait a few years and see what the makers do and let them get the bugs out.......

I don't really care how it looks. I want it to be reliable!

Tia

18 posted on 11/20/2003 12:54:57 PM PST by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
If you want it to be reliable then you want it to be Toyota.
19 posted on 11/20/2003 1:02:39 PM PST by stevio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
I see this as a "good first step".

If only it were American, I'd want one!

I'll wait a few years and see what the makers do and let them get the bugs out.......

Zactly! This is only the beginning. We will develop a whole arena of technology around this.

The first computer I ever worked on was the size of a small room. I typed cards with little square holes and fed them (the cards) into the room-sized computer. Today, 25 years later, my personal computer is about 1000 times as efficient at 100th the size.

These cars will evolve into a similar phenomenon. Now might be a good time to start buying stock.

And we will break our dependence upon raghead oil.

20 posted on 11/20/2003 1:06:08 PM PST by steppenwolffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson