[Cicero]

Since the Indians have their own interests, their news articles can't always be trusted, especially on Pakistan.

But in this instance I think they are absolutely right. Bosnia was a training ground for Muslim terrorists. Not only that, unlike the earlier war in Afghanistan to expel the Soviet Union, it has NO national security value for the United States. Precisely the opposite.

Clinton worked closely with the two forces that are the biggest threats to the United States: Communist China and Islamic fundamentalism. He gave China MIRVed ICBMs and nuclear warheads. He gave the Muslims invaluable training in terrorism against the west.

[Destro]

Robert_Paulson2: I got lotsa questions.

Another Indian, B Raman asked the following questions in his article: US after 9/11: None the wiser

Were they able to hoodwink the US agencies by projecting themselves as continuing allies of the US in its campaign against Saddam Hussein in Iraq and Slobodan Milosevic in Bosnia?

Did the HUM's role, found useful by the US, in training the jihadi opponents of Milosevic in Bosnia and Kosovo and participating in their jihad make the US agencies close their eyes to its burrowing into US homeland in preparation for taking the jihad to the US homeland?

[swarthyguy]

>>Since the Indians have their own interests, their news articles can't always be trusted, especially on Pakistan.


I love it when conservatives, instead of judging a particular individual's viewpoint, trot out tired cliches and engage in the worst kind of silly collective judgement.

Since the Americans have their own interests, their news articles can't always be trusted, especially on Iraq.

Since the Israelis have their own interests, their news articles can't always be trusted, especially on Palestine.

[Just mythoughts]

Don't leave out that he "adopted" the N. Koreans from Russia and gave them nukes, all cause they, so he said "wanted respect".

The clintons stated foreign policy "EQUALIZE ALL NATIONS"!

Was he blackmailed, or a true believer so long as he had a supply of "women"?