Skip to comments.
The Real History of the Crusades
crisismagazine ^
| April 1, 2002
| Thomas F. Madden
Posted on 11/22/2003 4:23:29 PM PST by dennisw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: dennisw
That is what gave birth to the Crusades. They were not the brainchild of an ambitious pope or rapacious knights but a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be subsumed by Islam. The Crusades were that defense. Amen!
41
posted on
11/22/2003 10:22:00 PM PST
by
A. Pole
To: liberty or death
The Crusades were the Repo Man going to get all those valuable "Chritian Relics" that a certain church wanted.Your medieval scholarship is rivaled only by your spelling.
To: dennisw; Holly_P
Best short run down on the Crusades I ever read...
and Holly_P 's Far Side Ice Crusades was the cherry topping!
43
posted on
11/22/2003 10:41:20 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: dennisw
Again I say, consider the Almightys goodness and pay heed to His plans of mercy. He puts Himself under obligation to you, or rather feigns to do so, that He can help you to satisfy your obligations toward Himself.... I call blessed the generation that can seize an opportunity of such rich indulgence as this.This is GWB's motivation. He seeks to raise up his generation to equal his father's.
But no one would seriously argue that the purpose of American wars is to kill women and children.
Many argue precisely this.
The ancient faith of Christianity, with its respect for women and antipathy toward slavery, not only survived but flourished. Without the Crusades, it might well have followed Zoroastrianism, another of Islams rivals, into extinction.
The board is set, the pieces are being positioned. Is it so difficult to see the future? Contrast the principle of freedom, which basically means freedom to choose, with the principle that the people must be ordered to comply, and one sees the true issue. As Neo says in the Matrix trilogy, "The problem is choice."
44
posted on
11/22/2003 11:45:48 PM PST
by
I_dmc
To: dennisw
Wonderful. More! More!
45
posted on
11/22/2003 11:50:08 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back!)
To: golindseygo
Excellent rebuttal!
46
posted on
11/23/2003 2:18:30 AM PST
by
Fawnn
(Official Canteen wOOhOO Consultant ... and www.CookingWithPam.com person)
To: golindseygo
Thanks for the history lesson :)
47
posted on
11/23/2003 2:20:31 AM PST
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: dennisw; Valin; tubavil; Stopislamnow; SJackson; BayouCoyote; nuffsenuff; Helms; Taiwan Bocks; ...
New ping list for Islamic Jihad and terrorism. 3 pings per day, every day. Some from my old ping list are on by default.
On or off let me know by freepmail.
Easy on, easy off, via freepmail.
48
posted on
11/23/2003 2:42:37 AM PST
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: lavrenti
This was posted in this forum a couple of years ago, but it's good to
see it re-posted.
I distributed this article to my tenth grade World History students
and discussed it in detail to counter the "Islam is peace" crap presented in
their useless textbook.
To: Sir Gawain
START!!!?!?!?
Where have you BEEN for the last 11 years??
50
posted on
11/23/2003 4:55:48 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: dennisw
Nevertheless, a fellow Cistercian monk named Radulf stirred up people against the Rhineland Jews, despite numerous letters from Bernard demanding that he stop. At last Bernard was forced to travel to Germany himself, where he caught up with Radulf, sent him back to his convent, and ended the massacres.
HMmmm..
Very interesting that a few centuries later another fellow named (R)Adolph ALSO stirred up HIS people against the descendants of those Jews: massacreing millions of them before being stopped.
51
posted on
11/23/2003 4:58:46 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: dennisw
Bump for later read. (Thanks for posting)
To: centurion316
bump
To: dennisw
Thanks; bump to finish later.
54
posted on
11/23/2003 6:14:09 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
To: dennisw
Great read. Additonal info on the True Cross from www.templarhistory.com
The Relic Of The True Cross
One of the outcomes of the Crusades was the production of many religious relics.
Among these alleged instruments of Divinity the more common ones were the bones
of Saints and soil from various places referred to in the Bible. Of a more important
nature were several heads said to be that of John the Baptist and the Crown of
Thorns which was actually sold by King Baldwin II of Jerusalem to King Louis IX of
France who built a shrine to house it. Of all the relics, none caused more furor and
deaths than that of the so-called "True Cross."
The True Cross is described as being part of the cross of Golgotha encased in gold
and studded with priceless gems. The legend of the True Cross begins in the year
326 when it was allegedly discovered by the mother of Constantine I, the Empress
Helena.
"In AD 326, Helena went on a journey to ancient Israel and selected with Macarius the
sites of Christ's birth at Bethlehem and at Jerusalem, the adjoining places of his tomb
burial and Crucifixion, where she happened to discover three ancient crosses in a cavern,
one of which was called the true cross."
Jerusalem "The Endless Crusade
by Andrew Sinclair
Now exactly how Helena determined which of the three discovered crosses was the
one Jesus was crucified on is covered in Michael Grant's book on the Roman
Emperor Constantine:
"Here Bishop Macarius of Jerusalem came to Helena's help, by undertaking, with a
prayer for God's help, to place a sick woman on each of the three crosses in turn, so that it
could then be seen what happened to her on each of the three occasions. When she was
placed on the first two crosses, nothing happened. Next, however, she was made to lie on
the third cross, whereupon she was healed. That, it was concluded, must have been the
True Cross on which Jesus met his death."
Constantine The Great
The Man And His Times
by Michael Grant
Upon Helena's return, the True Cross was kept in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher
in Jerusalem until the year 614 when Chrosroes II of Persia moved it to his own land
when he captured Jerusalem. Thirteen years later the Roman Emperor Heraclius
defeated Chrosroes and retook the relic, which he at first placed in Constantinople
and later, took back to its original Jerusalem. The True Cross is believed to have
been hidden by the Christians in 1009 C.E. and remained hidden for ninety years
only to be produced in 1099 during the First Crusade.
It remained in Christian hands until the Battle of Hattin in 1187, when the Moslem
leader Saladin captured the relic. It is believed that Saladin after the Battle of Hattin
and the capture of Jerusalem, would ride his horse through the streets with the Holy
Relic dragging behind his mount's tail.
"After The Horns of Hattin, Saladin was master of the Moslem world, and rode through the
streets of Damascus with the captured True Cross tied to his horse's tail and dragging in
the dust."
The Crusades
Henry Treece
1962
Despite the valiant efforts of Richard I during the Third Crusade, the True Cross
remained in Moslem hands. The beam itself disappeared, but fragments of the cross
that came off were collected and brought back to Europe after the Crusades. Of
course, If all the fragments were put back together then several hundred crosses
could have been made, as many of the pieces were most certainly fakes.
Although the so named True Cross was an inspiration and death sentence to many
brave men of the time, no trace of the relic is believed to exist today. Was this focal
point of the Crusaders, the True Cross as it was called. Perhaps we will never know.
The important thing remains that for those soldiers who took up the cause of the
Crusades, it was real enough to die for.
To: Elsie
Where have you BEEN for the last 11 years??Well, where do I sign up? Our side isn't even admitting this is a religious war.
To: golindseygo
I yeild to you eloquence.
Well said!
57
posted on
11/23/2003 8:54:06 PM PST
by
Bobibutu
To: Rome2000
They are stuck as you say,
If we choose to drag past garbage (wo is me look at all my stuff - which justifies my situation) we will have a problem awakining to the reality/opportunity that confronts us.
58
posted on
11/23/2003 8:58:35 PM PST
by
Bobibutu
To: Sir Gawain
So true...
I guess that's because we have no religion...........
59
posted on
11/24/2003 6:50:04 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: lavrenti
60
posted on
08/07/2004 5:49:38 PM PDT
by
technochick99
(Sanctimonious prig, proudly posting and criticizing (except the FRN) since 1999.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson