To: buffyt
Because they're a bunch of commie pinkos over at Time and have been for decades.
And I'm serious.
4 posted on
11/23/2003 7:16:41 AM PST by
Auntie Mame
(Why not go out on a limb, isn't that where the fruit is?)
To: Auntie Mame
Pinkos, my ass.
Take the white out of pink and you've got red.
6 posted on
11/23/2003 7:19:08 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(I like my women as I like my coffee: Cold and bitter.)
To: Auntie Mame
When I was in college in the 70's I stiffed Time for a six month subscription. It still makes me smile when I think about it. At the time, I didn't feel that I should have to pay to be indoctrinated. Heck, I may just do it again.
11 posted on
11/23/2003 7:23:13 AM PST by
kylaka
To: Auntie Mame
You are correct. (let us not forget the cover which called nationalism the evil of "one world" efforts. Particularly blaming the USA)
This seems an effort to make Bush a divider. It is a psych effort since GWBush said in 2000 he wants to be a unifier not a divider.
So far he is unified his base, he is unifying independents to him. He is even unifying the left into the modale/mcgovern camp.
Just a fluffy hit piece. Time is as relevant as "US" or "People" magazine. Once upon a time "life" magazine was relevant.
To: Auntie Mame
"Because they're a bunch of commie pinkos over at Time and have been for decades.
And I'm serious."
Oh and you are CORRECT! Let me say it again, I used to go with my dad and brother to the barbershop when the boys would be getting their haircuts, just so I could read the mags. This would be 35 years ago, or more now. I was just always a compulsive reader. Time magazine s*cked then as it does to this day.
93 posted on
11/23/2003 11:48:51 PM PST by
jocon307
(Irish grandma rolls in grave, yet again)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson