Replies

You Posted: I would like to see a list of specific deficiencies the homo lobby wants "corrected." I think the state should butt out of any arrangements two individuals want to make with regards to their personal property. As to insurance benefits, those are not provided by the government, and should not be the government's concern. Take it up with the insurance company. Social Security? Allow a beneficiary to be designated.

As far as inheritance, a will can be made out to leave an estate to anyone. Michael Jackson could leave Neverland to his monkey.

But none of these things constitute a marriage, at least not in the fullest sense of that word. For that, a spiritual recognition is necessary. And I am free to withhold that recognition all the while honoring the legal arrangements between two homosexuals.

My reply: I know how all the posts on this web site are anti gay, so I'll jsut say this and leave. Regarding your comment above- Well I guess no hetrosexual athiests are married then right? I have a hard time at this web site reading the "hetrosexual agenda".. No personal atttacks please, it makes you look small..

I know how all the posts on this web site are anti gay, so I'll jsut say this and leave.

Anti-gay? I don't know anybody here who's anti-gay and I run the homosexual agenda ping list. From what I can tell, everybody on the ping list is only interested in the truth. I'd say it's those folks who are pro-gay that don't really care for gays.

Why? Because the pro-gay folks only encourage a very destructive lifestyle that results in severe health hazards where the folks on the ping list discourage that same behavior. And not just for the homosexuals, but for the general health and safety of our nation and our world.

We welcome discourse based on studies that haven't been discredited.

"My reply: I know how all the posts on this web site are anti gay..."

So, if we object to the gay agenda being collectively shoved down our throats at every turn, that makes us "anti-gay?"

You are a bigot. Celebrate your bigotry. Come out of the closet and just say that you hate conservatives.

It's so much more honest.

I guess no hetrosexual athiests are married then right?

"Married" in what sense? If they're atheists, they probably didn't opt for a church wedding. So that means they're married for the state's purposes, the very situation we've been discussing here. I repeat, the state does not require any spiritual dimension to endorse a relationship, nor should it. But the resulting union is a "marriage" in the same sense that a contract between me and my mechanic is.

And don't post then retreat. It just makes you look small.