Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Makers of ``The Reagans'' complain about CBS `butchering' movie
Associated Press ^ | 11-24-03 | DAVID BAUDER, AP Television Writer

Posted on 11/24/2003 4:58:46 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:44:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

NEW YORK (AP) -- The director of "The Reagans" complained Monday that CBS' butchered his made-for-TV movie, ultimately making it too incoherent for the network to air.

"We were, in a sense, banished" from the editing process before CBS ditched it, director Robert Ackerman said.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New York
KEYWORDS: cbs; reagan; thereagans
Vermin.
1 posted on 11/24/2003 4:58:49 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Let them sell it to Cuban or N. Koean state TV. Oops, sorry, no capitalism means no ad revenue, means no money for idiot shows like this one.
2 posted on 11/24/2003 5:01:35 PM PST by dagnabbit (Stop immigrating Islam. Don't let France happen to America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I suppose it was a masterpiece before editing.
3 posted on 11/24/2003 5:02:41 PM PST by BunnySlippers (Help Bring Colly-fornia Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagnabbit
This hatchet-job of a movie is yet one more example of why pop culture must die so that America might live
4 posted on 11/24/2003 5:05:05 PM PST by Paleoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The director of "The Reagans" complained Monday that CBS' butchered his made-for-TV movie, ultimately making it too incoherent for the network to air.

Cry me a river.

The directors' cuts of movies are QUITE OFTEN adulterated. If he can't deal, he's in the wrong biz.

5 posted on 11/24/2003 5:06:23 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I complained about the "Makers of The Reagans" butchering Reagan.

Babs, go soak your hot head in ice water - then you'll be the same temperature all over - ice cold.... as in frigid!

6 posted on 11/24/2003 5:06:42 PM PST by HardStarboard (Dump Wesley Clark.....he worries me as much as Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
When their lousy defamatory film is released in the U.K. they will soon learn all about butchery. Libel laws are tougher and there is no New York Times v. Sullivan requirement to prove "actual malice." I predict it will get very bloody indeed for the producers, directors, writers and actors.
7 posted on 11/24/2003 5:07:41 PM PST by ex-Texan (CBS [SeeBS] Deserves a Long Double Flush . . . Pull the Chain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"The film being taken off the air ... appears to be an attack on free speech," said Davis, who plays Nancy Reagan. "We don't like what we suspect you might be saying, so we'll do everything in our power to remove it from a major network so people can't hear what you're saying."

Typical ignorant media leftist comment. No government agency at any level was involved in the campaign to cancel "The Reagans." Therefore it makes no sense to call it an "attack on free speech."

To the contrary, it was a victory for free speech: ordinary Americans who had neither millions of dollars nor ownership of a television network spoke out against CBS' outrageously mendacious gay fascist hit piece against President Reagan, and in the contest of opposing "free speech" positions, the "free speech" of ordinary Americans won.

8 posted on 11/24/2003 5:15:41 PM PST by Map Kernow ("In terra pax in hominibus bonae voluntatis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
His co-star, Judy Davis, criticized the "level of censorship" involved in CBS' cancellation of the movie.

Funny. I thought "censorship" was when the Government limited the dissemination of "offensive" material. I didn't know the Feds had anything to do with this whole sorry episode...

I also like how she thinks that people have a RIGHT to have their views displayed on network TV:

Blahblahblah "Free Speech" blahblahblah "We don't like what we suspect you might be saying, so we'll do everything in our power to remove it from a major network so people can't hear what you're saying."

9 posted on 11/24/2003 5:16:23 PM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gee, I wonder what they thought as they went about butchering the Reagans life?
10 posted on 11/24/2003 5:16:31 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
His co-star, Judy Davis, criticized the "level of censorship" involved in CBS' cancellation of the movie.

"The film being taken off the air ... appears to be an attack on free speech," said Davis, who plays Nancy Reagan. "We don't like what we suspect you might be saying, so we'll do everything in our power to remove it from a major network so people can't hear what you're saying."

Somebody please explain to Ms. Davis (an Australian) that if it was censorship, the stars and producers would have been jailed, the film would have been collected by a SWAT team and burned and nobody could have seen it (on Showtime or otherwise).

This was a business decision, pure and simple.

11 posted on 11/24/2003 5:22:00 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I was told it was going to be a love story,..."

it is...
demonRATS "love to HATE anything or anyone that is good, wholesome, moral, decent, and or conservative...

"the truth shall set you free"

12 posted on 11/24/2003 5:53:32 PM PST by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"The film being taken off of the air ... appears to be an attack on free speech."

Wrong....No one forced CBS to cancel this movie. What these liberals don't understand is that free speech is the right of all Americans. If I find fault with this movie, then I am free to not see it and I'm free to encourage other folks to do the same thing.

IMHO....Free speech is alive and kicking for everyone!
13 posted on 11/24/2003 6:30:45 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92
"Neil Meron, one of the film's producers, said the filmmakers' only point of view was to humanize Ronald and Nancy Reagan."

Oh, B.S.!!!! This crap film is about DE-humanizing President and Mrs. Reagan!!!!!

Idiots!!!!
14 posted on 11/24/2003 7:05:33 PM PST by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92
Moonves could have decided to run it commercial-free.

Or Babs and Les could have sponsored it themselves.

Or Judy Davis could have sponsored it with a grant from the Australian Film Board. Or the Film Board of Canada. Wasn't it made up there?

I'm surprised PBS isn't running it for "gimme" drives

15 posted on 11/24/2003 7:21:35 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Reagan supporters said there was no evidence that the former president ever said any such thing.

Note the evil in writing. Somehow this implies that
Reagan detractors have evidence of the aids line.
Somehow only supporters don't believe it. This ap reporter must be a homosexual supporter of the aids agenda.

The left trying to pigeon hole those who do not support them.

16 posted on 11/25/2003 7:12:06 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Reagan supporters said there was no evidence that the
former president ever said any such thing.

Note the evil in writing. Somehow this implies that
Reagan detractors have evidence of the aids line.
Somehow only supporters don't believe it. This ap reporter
must be a homosexual supporter of the aids agenda. The left trying to pigeon hole those who do not support them.

17 posted on 11/25/2003 7:18:05 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson