[r9etb]

Sure I'm suspicious of the terrorists.

But if I work hard to extract the full meaning of your subtly nuanced opinions, I am forced to the following conclusion:

You are claiming that the American soldiers who investigated the case, brought the guards up on charges, took testimony, have far more facts on the case than you do; who found against the guards, and demoted/discharged them ...

Well, those American soldiers who ruled against the guards must be pro-Iraqi terrorist-lovers, too.

Is that about it?

[ConservativeMan55]

"You are claiming that the American soldiers who investigated the case, brought the guards up on charges, took testimony, have far more facts on the case than you do; who found against the guards, and demoted/discharged them ..."

I'm not claiming that at all. In fact the article doesn't even mention half of the crap you just posted! Did you make that up or do you have an alternative source you aren't sharing?