Memo to: Saddam Hussein
From: President Bush
Nuts.
W
1 posted on
11/26/2003 9:31:02 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
good one
To: Pokey78
Thomas Freidman channels Saddam Hussein. Why does this not surprise me. Why does it not surprise me either that this manifestation of Hussein sounds like a 'moderate' Democrat?
3 posted on
11/26/2003 9:58:35 PM PST by
thoughtomator
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: Pokey78
Friedman is such a loser. He's just praying we fail and he's doing everything in his power to make it happen.
JERK!
To: Pokey78
Sometimes I think I am the only person in the world that thinks Bush's plan on Iraq is a good one. We don't need a lot of soldiers over there making more targets. And Saddam can not win. If it was Saddams plan to hide in the shadows it was a dumb one. Come on Tom, the people of Iraq will not let the Baath party come back. They are universally despised there and to think they can make a comeback is completely ridiculous.
We need to train as many Iraqis as we can, get them started on the right foot constitutionally, and move our troops to some base in the middle of the desert in case they are needed quickly. Iraq needs to sort most of their mess out themselves experiencing all the growing pains of a democracy.
Also, I have not seen this speculated about. But its my theory that there was something behind Bush's sudden change of plan to reduce troops in Iraq and hand over power to the council quicker. I think he may have received information that something is up and our troops may be needed elsewhere soon. We may need to finish Iraq up quicker than originally planned.
5 posted on
11/26/2003 10:35:09 PM PST by
GROOVY
To: Pokey78
Another item for the bursting file of clips proving Ann Coulter right: The New York Times is TREASONOUS.
If this isn't aid and comfort for the enemy, what is?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson