Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion
Something is strange here.

Yes, I agree. In the transcript of a discussion with reporters on board AF1 he said this...

"I even went up to the cockpit and watched Tillman bring it in -- which, had the security been broken there would have been the time that we would have been most vulnerable. However, the plane -- that's why Colonel Tillman's judgment was so important to this -- this plane is protected, it's protected against the kinds of things that could be used against it. It also -- we obviously flew in, in the dark, precautions were taken."

He certainly seems to be implying that he was aboard AF1 when they landed in Baghdad. I wouldn't think that he would lie about something like that after the fact. It would serve no good purpose that I can discern. In fact, it could be used against him if it can be proven that he lied like that.

1,941 posted on 11/30/2003 10:11:38 AM PST by IoCaster ("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1937 | View Replies ]


To: IoCaster
"He certainly seems to be implying that he was aboard AF1 when they landed in Baghdad"

Never mentioned 747 and if he was in a Piper Cub it would still be AF-1

There is no reason that a G-5 wouldn't have the same protections as one of the 747s.

Implied=Assume=Ass U &Me.
1,942 posted on 11/30/2003 10:24:43 AM PST by dalereed (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1941 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson