Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger paroles woman who killed husband's mistress
AtlanticJournal-Constitutiuon ^ | 11/28/2003 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/28/2003 9:39:44 AM PST by PeteFromMontana

Schwarzenegger paroles woman who killed husband's mistress

The Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Arnold Schwarzenegger has agreed to parole a woman who killed her husband's mistress in 1987, the second time in a week the newly elected governor has granted the release of a convicted murderer.

Schwarzenegger's decision Wednesday marks a departure from former Gov. Gray Davis, who during his five years repeatedly refused to grant paroles approved by the state's Board of Prison Terms.

Davis blocked all but eight of 294 paroles approved by the board in murder cases. He twice rejected parole for Rosario Munoz, the woman Schwarzenegger has agreed to free.

Under state law, the governor can reject the state board's parole decisions. California is one of only three states that grants governors that power.

Schwarzenegger did not comment on his decision to parole Munoz, a 51-year-old mother of three who was convicted in 1989 of killing her husband's lover in Los Angeles.

The board's approval of Munoz's parole was based on her apparent remorse for the killing, psychological evaluations that showed a slim chance of her offending again and her efforts to raise money for the victim's daughter by selling portraits, said board spokesman Bill Sessa.

Schwarzenegger granted his first parole last Thursday, three days after taking office, when he agreed to release a Sacramento man convicted of a 1985 murder. He also denied parole for a man who killed a woman while driving drunk in 1986.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; catrans; parole; schwarzenegger

1 posted on 11/28/2003 9:39:44 AM PST by PeteFromMontana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
One Terminator to another.
2 posted on 11/28/2003 9:51:19 AM PST by SquirrelKing (If I don't have another beer, then the terrorists win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Davis blocked all but eight of 294 paroles approved by the board in murder cases.

With Davis it was probably to maintain full employment of prison guards and make him look tough on crime. Why else would he reject ~97% of the recommendations from a panel he probably appointed, concern for victims or the community was not in his philosophy.

3 posted on 11/28/2003 10:02:43 AM PST by evolved_rage (Ah yes, the cultural benefits of SF. You never know when you are stepping in ick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
Why else would he reject ~97%...

I'm guessing, but perhaps because they were guilty of murder, and the parole board was more liberal than he was.

4 posted on 11/28/2003 10:08:40 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PeteFromMontana
Arnie didn't "parole" her. He decided not to veto the "parole" by the responsible authorities.

I prefer a governor who considers these matters case by case and acts as he considers right to a governor who predetermines what his decisions will be in order to look "tough on crime."

It's mostly leftists who need the fig leaf of looking "tough on crime." Clinton behaved the same way. Nobody doubts that Arnie is tough.
5 posted on 11/28/2003 10:28:44 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
That would make sense for most normal people...But Davis did not do anything out of concern for anybody but himself. He would have pardoned Charles Manson if it would have helped him stay in office. I think the parole board was just something he could get away saying no to by design. I won't even grudgingly admit that Davis was tough on convicted murderers, it was not his motivation.
6 posted on 11/28/2003 10:37:17 AM PST by evolved_rage (Ah yes, the cultural benefits of SF. You never know when you are stepping in ick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Nobody doubts that Arnie is tough.

He's tough as an actor, but who knows as a politician. He won't stand tough for the unborn.

7 posted on 11/28/2003 2:26:32 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson