YOU: I see, the flashbangs marched over the WACO and fired themselves off. I've got it now.
Don, your posts are filled with combinations of false premises, generalized comments, and unsupported assertions. Let me help you. To counter an argument which says that the Army followed the law, to include Posse Comitatus, and that there is no evidence of military wrongdoing, you should cite something the Army did wrong, the law that was violated, and your evidence for that violation. A reference to self-detonating, marching pyrotechnics is not a counter-argument.
Disagreeing with you is an inadequate criteria for a false premise.
generalized comments, and unsupported assertions. Let me help you. To counter an argument which says that the Army followed the law, to include Posse Comitatus, and that there is no evidence of military wrongdoing, you should cite something the Army did wrong, the law that was violated, and your evidence for that violation. A reference to self-detonating, marching pyrotechnics is not a counter-argument.
Since that is not my contention, there is no point in continuing to chastise me for not supporting it. My contention is that the army, like the rest of the gangsters mustering for this fiasco, displayed no discernably effective conscience comparable to that which any uneducated ghetto mother could muster concerning using military equipment to destroy a building full of children. What this means--to anyone not hyponotized by incessent jury-rigged propaganda and still possessed of a brain and a heart--is that the act was intentional--just as it appeared to be on CBS news.
What kind of a proud claim is it that the commander of that military unit tasked to assist in this sat with his thumb up his butt watching this occur on CBS? Shame on him, and shame on you for applauding this cowardly and irresponsible behavior, if, in fact, it is what really transpired, which I seriously doubt.