I have been hearing this particularly foul bit of misinformation being spewed by various liberals. Maybe this article, by one of their own kind, will serve to dispel this attempt to smear President Bush.
1 posted on
11/29/2003 6:58:16 AM PST by
Maria S
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Maria S
I have been hearing this particularly foul bit of misinformation being spewed by various liberals. Maybe this article, by one of their own kind, will serve to dispel this attempt to smear President Bush. Opening line of the article:
Liberal invective against George W. Bush has not yet descended to the depths plumbed by conservatives in their crusade against the Clintons,...
When you start the article like this you lose all credibility. Clinton earned the attacks against him, and conservative were right about him. You cannot make that case for the liberals and Bush.
To: Maria S
Joe "Dead Eyes" Conason is one POS. What a pitiful person he is.
3 posted on
11/29/2003 7:03:58 AM PST by
Ann Archy
To: Maria S
He says that the liberal invective against Bush has not yet plumbed to the depths of the conservative invective against Clinton. Give me an example of the invective against Clinton that was lower than calling Bush a Nazi.
4 posted on
11/29/2003 7:06:13 AM PST by
Brilliant
To: Maria S
Hmmm... Wasn't Oskar Schindler "a Nazi industrial magnate"?
5 posted on
11/29/2003 7:11:13 AM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
To: Maria S
In the mid-1980s, I bought hundreds of tons of stainless steel from Thyssen. I guess that makes me a Nazi.
6 posted on
11/29/2003 7:19:47 AM PST by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: Maria S
To: Maria S
Methinks some on the left are getting worried at how shrill and ridiculous they appear to the middle and more traditional Democrats. Just their true colors shining through ;-)
8 posted on
11/29/2003 7:27:18 AM PST by
Tamzee
(Pennsylvanians for Bush! Join http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PA4BushCheney/)
To: Maria S
Funny. Not one word about the documented collaboration between Ted Kennedy's father and Hitler...
9 posted on
11/29/2003 7:56:21 AM PST by
pabianice
To: Maria S
I have been hearing this particularly foul bit of misinformation being spewed by various liberals. Maybe this article, by one of their own kind, will serve to dispel this attempt to smear President Bush.Maria, this is just another smear article trying to link the Bush family with the Nazis.
The title is misleading, and was written as 'cover' for the smear. This is how libs operate. They believe they are being sneaky, and many times they are. This one was too obvious. You need to re-read this a few times.
To: Maria S
"...George W. Bush. He is, among other things, a truly bad President."What, then, would be the accurate way to describe Klintoon? If W is a truly bad President, then please, Lord, give me the truly bad ones over and over and...
To: Maria S
Let me get this right. Although the accusation of ties between the Bushs and Nazis is correct, It doesn't rise to the level of Clinton bashing. Goebbels would be prod. This writer leaves his foul scent on the Bush name, but is lauded for his reasonable criticism.
To: Maria S
Liberal invective against George W. Bush has not yet descended to the depths plumbed by conservatives in their crusade against the ClintonsNice way to begin an article: with a whopper of a lie.
14 posted on
11/29/2003 8:49:22 AM PST by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: Maria S
Liberals always call their opponents "Nazis." The latest edition of the Southern Poverty Law Center's magazine lists the NRA as a "hate group."
To: Maria S
In America, the sins of the fathers are not held against the children, nor should they be.Are you kidding me, Joe? This is the very basis for all the Affirmative Action laws on the books. It is even used to justify riot and murder.
How is trading with pre-war Germany morally worse than trading with China, which e'en as we speak is wiping Tibet off the face of the earth, today? (It's also curious and interesting that trade with Imperial Japan is never scrutinized in this manner.)
17 posted on
11/29/2003 9:47:54 AM PST by
jordan8
To: Maria S
Too many in "corporate America" are communist "Red" Chinese collaborators, in addition to the "liberal media" who have been communist "Red" Chinese collaborators and Stalinist collaborators since before World War II. Tens of millions of people have died by the communists and their sympathizing collaborators' [im]"moral support."
Which is not to diminish the role of the NAZI sympathizers, but to lump them all together into their fascist regimes whose number one product was death for the people.
19 posted on
11/29/2003 12:13:44 PM PST by
First_Salute
(God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: Maria S
Whatever one may think otherwise about him, Conason deserves some credit for calling out the more insane hyperbole that has taken hold of the fever swamps of the Left.
One wishes he had more company.
To: Maria S
Joe Conehead raises the Nazi slander once again while pretending to tut-tut it.
From what I hear, Prescott Bush probably wasn't a very nice guy. So what? Joe Kennedy wasn't a very nice guy either, and the press doesn't obsess about him very often.
21 posted on
11/29/2003 1:07:53 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Maria S
Liberal invective against George W. Bush has not yet descended to the depths plumbed by conservatives in their crusade against the Clintons..... The very first sentence of this piece is patently false.
22 posted on
11/29/2003 1:16:14 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: Maria S
Attempting to give "Sour Grapes" some sort of "Academic Legitimacy."
WHAT FUN!--to watch the "Academic Left" SQUIRM!!
Doc
To: Maria S
There are many unflattering terms that can and should be used to describe George W. Bush. He is, among other things, a truly bad President. But neither his offenses, nor the Republican Partys politics of personal destruction, can justify using such tactics against him. Why not say what makes him bad? Why not identify his offenses? Why not enumerate his use of "politics of personal destruction"?
Like Martin Sheen, who could not pass a college entrance exam (he has no degree) calling W "dumb"...of course W has degrees from Harvard and Yale.
Like so many liberals, they call people stupid or mean instead of attacking ideas, they attack people. It's the Clinton/McAuliffe way. It is and will continue to bury th democratic party. :0)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson