Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
In wealthy urban areas. True.

I can always count on you to start making idiotic points that let me know that you have progressed into "arguing for argument's sake" territory. Of course the doctors are better in wealthy urban areas. Which rural areas do you suppose have the better doctors, the rich ones or the poor ones? Do you imagine Greenwich (Ct) Hospital has a decent staff?

The point remains: The best doctors tend to be found in urban areas. Now stop wasting our time. It's ok to be wrong occasionally.

64 posted on 12/01/2003 10:34:30 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
It's ok to be wrong occasionally

:)

67 posted on 12/01/2003 10:49:53 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Small rural hospitals face certain insurmountable disadvantages; they cannot afford the best diagnostic equipment, or specialists, or ER doctors.

But they often do very well with what they have - sometimes better than what urban hospitals do with many more resources.

With some regulatory changes they might be able to do even better.

82 posted on 12/01/2003 1:31:36 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson