Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah Polygamist Invokes Ruling on Gay Sex
AP ^ | December 1, 2003 | MARK THIESSEN

Posted on 12/01/2003 5:01:52 PM PST by Kay Soze

December 1, 2003, 7:38 PM EST

SALT LAKE CITY -- A lawyer for a Utah man with five wives argued Monday that his polygamy convictions should be thrown out following a Supreme Court decision decriminalizing gay sex.

The nation's high court in June struck down a Texas sodomy law, ruling that what gay men and women do in the privacy of their homes is no business of government.

It's no different for polygamists, argued Tom Green's attorney, John Bucher, to the Utah Supreme Court.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blueoyster; buttpirates; catholiclist; disney; gay; gaylifestyle; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; lawrencevtexas; marriage; polygamy; prisoners; slipperyslope; sodomy; stoptheexcerpts; tomgreen; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: jwalsh07
The Mass SJC ruled on the basis of state law, not federal law. You didn't really think I'd overlook something so obvious, did you?
41 posted on 12/01/2003 5:35:42 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
I won't hold my breath waiting for the apologies to Sen. Santorum.
42 posted on 12/01/2003 5:36:38 PM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Its starting!

And won't end until one can "marry" one's pet. The slide into Sodom and Gomorrah continues.

5.56mm

43 posted on 12/01/2003 5:36:51 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
From the decision:

"Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral code." Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472, 2480 (2003) (Lawrence), quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 850 (1992).

44 posted on 12/01/2003 5:36:51 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"My wife and I are very cheerful..."

No doubt you have a gay old time.

45 posted on 12/01/2003 5:39:28 PM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scripter
And so...it begins.
46 posted on 12/01/2003 5:39:54 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane
Once upon a time, the law in Kentucky stated that the age of consent for a young lady to marry was (either 14 or 16, I dont remember which), "unless the woman has been previously married or the bride & groom are related"

Incest will make your teeth fall out.

47 posted on 12/01/2003 5:40:23 PM PST by X-FID ( The police aren't in the streets to create disorder; they are in the streets to preserve disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
This may be the ultimate time share.
48 posted on 12/01/2003 5:40:32 PM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Lawrence was superfluous to the decision, as it was to the decisions in Hawai'i, Alaska, and Vermont which preceded Lawrence. If you don't believe me, get back to me when the State of Massachusetts appeals Goodrich to the Supreme Court of the United States.
49 posted on 12/01/2003 5:43:31 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
"Anyways. . . I never really could figure out what wrong with homosexual relationships and why so called conservatives want the the goverment to legislate laws against it?! "

Right. Homos are just a Tempest in a tea pot. Right?

50 posted on 12/01/2003 5:44:12 PM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
How do you expect him to deal with it? Does the term "Separation of Powers" ring a bell?
51 posted on 12/01/2003 5:45:05 PM PST by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper Network station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
"Sometime before puberty?"

Amen.

52 posted on 12/01/2003 5:47:27 PM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
See post #40. He can and should come out and say that he supports Congress' efforts to pass a Marriage Amendment. Use the bully pulpit for something other than enlarging entitlement programs.
53 posted on 12/01/2003 5:48:10 PM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
Just wondering, has there ever been a poll on which religions support homosexual marriage the most?
54 posted on 12/01/2003 5:50:12 PM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Antiguv, it is instructive that the first case mentioned by the SJC of Mass was Lawrence and whats more I know you are plenty sharp enough to realise it.

The path to the destruction of marriage has its origins in Lawrence, a brief stop in a liberal New England State for a majority of 1 oligarch to redefine marriage and straight through to the full faith and credit clause.

You know it, I know it and the proponents of homosexual "marriage" know it. Of course, should they succeed there will be unintended consequences because every adult will be able to exercise there new found "right to marriage".

It can be stopped but I'm not optimistic about it. I say that knowing that we diverge on "homosexual" marriage.

55 posted on 12/01/2003 5:53:57 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl; Tempest
Isn't marriage for most folks a union between a man and woman in the eyes of GOD?

Asking for government to get more involved in religion always ends up getting government more involved in religion. Why is it that government is involved in this in the first place? DUMB DUMB DUMB.
56 posted on 12/01/2003 5:56:34 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (When laws are regularly flouted, respect of the law and law enforcement diminishes correspondingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
Like how are they gonna enforce that one? Demand that one of the partners be sterilized? I can just see that happening.
57 posted on 12/01/2003 5:58:27 PM PST by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: truthandjustice1
Here's one I saw recently: Religious Beliefs Underpin Opposition to Homosexuality.
58 posted on 12/01/2003 5:59:40 PM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
And so the slide down the slippery slope begins.
59 posted on 12/01/2003 6:00:06 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro
Bingo. Court shopping is a game any group can play. In fact, considering how this is Utah, I would not be surprised if their isn't at least one closet polygamist already on the bench somewhere back state.
60 posted on 12/01/2003 6:00:16 PM PST by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson