To: panther33
Just to further the debate, as I mentioned to my college-age daughter this weekend when she raised the topic with me, remove for a moment the Biblical position on the subject, and consider only the scientific aspects: if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species?
Does this not conflict with a basic rule of nature? Does this not conflict with the very law of survival?
9 posted on
12/01/2003 8:36:00 PM PST by
Chummy
(Billary in Baghdad was for Political Purposes)
To: Chummy
if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species? Since only about 2% of the population is homosexual, and some of them do have biological children, the effect of homosexuality on the long term population is most likely negligible
39 posted on
12/01/2003 8:52:58 PM PST by
WackyKat
To: Chummy
"...if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species?
Does this not conflict with a basic rule of nature? Does this not conflict with the very law of survival?"
What about Nuns & Priests that abstain? Do they pose a survival threat to the species & should they be forced to procreate?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson