Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: panther33
Just to further the debate, as I mentioned to my college-age daughter this weekend when she raised the topic with me, remove for a moment the Biblical position on the subject, and consider only the scientific aspects: if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species?

Does this not conflict with a basic rule of nature? Does this not conflict with the very law of survival?

9 posted on 12/01/2003 8:36:00 PM PST by Chummy (Billary in Baghdad was for Political Purposes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Chummy
if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species?

Since only about 2% of the population is homosexual, and some of them do have biological children, the effect of homosexuality on the long term population is most likely negligible

39 posted on 12/01/2003 8:52:58 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Chummy
"...if a species practiced homosexuality and the majority in the species accepted the practice, what would the odds be for the longterm viability of the species?

Does this not conflict with a basic rule of nature? Does this not conflict with the very law of survival?"

What about Nuns & Priests that abstain? Do they pose a survival threat to the species & should they be forced to procreate?
200 posted on 12/02/2003 9:14:31 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson