1 posted on
12/02/2003 5:19:15 AM PST by
chambley1
To: chambley1
I weary of the olagarchy of Despots who insist they have
discovered a bettermorality than that of the founders.
Yes --to some--crimes against nature--is discriminatory--
what isn't?The fraudulant Lawrence v.Texas has allready
spawned divisive legal wranglings. A Utah polygamist wants
his case overturned and Lawrence v.Texas is cited. No doubt
NAMBLA wants Man-boy sex reckognized as Constitutional--
for no doubt adult males who get their jollies with young boys think it is discriminatory.There is that guy in
Jerry Springers America who wanted to marry his TV.
Decadence ad nausium
2 posted on
12/02/2003 5:33:02 AM PST by
StonyBurk
To: chambley1; Coop; Mudboy Slim; putupon; sultan88
Karen Darner
is a "crime against nature."
But for the grace of God, she would have been my son's speech therapist.
3 posted on
12/02/2003 6:36:41 AM PST by
Corin Stormhands
(I'm not Fonda Hillary! / www.wardsmythe.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson