Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/02/2003 5:19:15 AM PST by chambley1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: chambley1
I weary of the olagarchy of Despots who insist they have
discovered a bettermorality than that of the founders.
Yes --to some--crimes against nature--is discriminatory--
what isn't?The fraudulant Lawrence v.Texas has allready
spawned divisive legal wranglings. A Utah polygamist wants
his case overturned and Lawrence v.Texas is cited. No doubt
NAMBLA wants Man-boy sex reckognized as Constitutional--
for no doubt adult males who get their jollies with young boys think it is discriminatory.There is that guy in
Jerry Springers America who wanted to marry his TV.
Decadence ad nausium
2 posted on 12/02/2003 5:33:02 AM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chambley1; Coop; Mudboy Slim; putupon; sultan88
Karen Darner is a "crime against nature."

But for the grace of God, she would have been my son's speech therapist.

3 posted on 12/02/2003 6:36:41 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (I'm not Fonda Hillary! / www.wardsmythe.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson