Posted on 12/02/2003 11:15:18 AM PST by MrFreedom
Supreme Court to Decide on Foster Photos
LOS ANGELES - Five government investigations concluded that White House attorney Vincent Foster's death in 1993 was a suicide. But Allan Favish, a Clinton antagonist from Southern California, suspects murder and is demanding to see 10 of the police photos.
On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites) will hear arguments on whether to release those photographs, in a potentially precedent-setting case pitting the public's right to know against the Foster family's privacy. The family does not want the pictures of the body released.
The case is more than a battle over sensational evidence in the death of a high-level Clinton administration official. It represents the first time the Supreme Court has agreed to rule directly on the privacy interests of the surviving family in a Freedom of Information Act case.
The outcome could increase the government's ability to withhold information from the public and the media, said Jane Kirtley, a media ethics and law professor at the University of Minnesota who filed a brief in support of Favish.
Several media-ethics organizations have filed court papers supporting Favish's position. On the other side, Teresa Earnhardt, the widow of race car driver Dale Earnhardt (news - web sites) who fought to keep his autopsy photographs private, has filed papers in support of the government.
Foster, 48, was found dead of a gunshot to the head in a park in Virginia, outside the nation's capital. Foster, a longtime friend of Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton (news - web sites), was handling several personal legal matters for them at the time, including their investment in the Whitewater real estate venture. A file on Whitewater was in Foster's office at the time.
Independent prosecutor Kenneth Starr and other investigators concluded Foster shot himself. Foster's widow, Lisa, has said he was severely depressed and afraid that seeking treatment could jeopardize his career.
Despite those findings, conspiracy theories that he was murdered in a White House cover-up abound.
Favish believes 10 photographs taken when Foster's body was discovered could reveal evidence that points to murder. He already has reviewed about 100 other photographs, some of which are posted on his Web site.
Favish, who worked for the conservative legal group Judicial Watch in the late 1990s, denies any political motivation for his quest and said the group did not fund his case. Judicial Watch filed numerous lawsuits against the Clinton administration.
"I'm just a citizen who's very concerned about the integrity of the nation's law enforcement agencies," said Favish, 48, adding that he spent $5,000 of his own money pursuing the photos. "The dominant media totally dropped the ball on this case."
The Santa Clarita insurance lawyer is specifically interested in seeing patterns of blood at the scene and a possible bullet hole in Foster's neck. That hole was reported by one of the first paramedics on scene, an observation that conflicts with official reports of a single shot fired into the mouth.
Favish said there were gaps in the investigation "that could only be the product of extreme negligence or an intentional cover-up."
Lower-court judges have ordered the release of only four or five of the photographs, saying the rest were too graphic. The selected photos were never made public because the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.
The high court will have two questions before it: Does a provision in the 37-year-old Freedom of Information Act that allows the government to withhold materials that "constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" extend to family members of the subject? And if it does, does the public's right to know outweigh the family's pain?
In court filings, Bush administration Solicitor General Theodore Olson cited a 1991 federal appeals court ruling that said NASA (news - web sites) did not have to release tapes of the final moments of the Challenger disaster to The New York Times because the material would cause the families grief. The Supreme Court declined to hear that case.
Foster's widow chose not to open his casket because she did not want to see his damaged body. Releasing the photographs would expose her to the sight merely because of the whims of a "curious member of the public," Olson wrote.
"FOIA's carefully crafted protection of personal privacy would be rendered an empty promise if it could be overcome by little more than an idiosyncratic distrust of government or the creative spawning of conspiracy theories by any one FOIA requester," he wrote.
James Hamilton, attorney for Foster's family, declined an interview.
___
On the Net:
Briefs in Supreme Court case: http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/home.html
Allan Favish site: http://www.allanfavish.com
My guess is they've been threatened. They know it wasn't a joke.
Foster told his secritery if he doesn't make it back from his trip to flee the country. Investigators found her and interviewed her in Canada. She did what Foster told her. She ran for her life.
I did not know That, Thanks
I hope they get those photos. It could bring out a hornets nest.
Privacy aspects aside, the way Dale died is not disputed and there will likely be no forthcoming criminal charges brought upon release of his photos. But if the photos of Vince Foster differ in any material way from the way his death was represented, then criminal charges ranging from "lying on an official document" through murder can be contemplated.
Hence, the Dale's and Vince's cases are quite different.
I did not know That, Thanks
I'm sorry. That was Rob Brown. His plane went down on the way back from a Clinton/Enron deal. Clinton refused to send out a search party to find his plane. He said "I guess it will always have to remain a mystery."
A forest ranger found it. According to the ranger, he had a hole in his skull. Autopsy photos are "missing."
That's the funeral where Clinton was laughing until he saw the camera, and them suddenly burst into tears (video clip has been shown here quite a bit).
Sorry. There's so many dead, it's hard to keep track of them all.
Huh? Brown's plane had something like 40 people on it, many of them top executives on a trade mission to Croatia. The plane was found fairly quickly, but everyone was dead, save for one survivor who somehow died on the way to the hospital of a severed femoral artery, or so I've read.
Unless you have access to new information, I don't believe that this is true.I was part of the original private newsgroup with Hugh Sprunt (used to live near me), MiaT, Michael Rivero, and Allan Favish (as in "Lavish") that did so much of the investigatory work on Foster. I don't ever recall hearing this story. It was I who created the PDF file of Ken Starr's Foster report that was posted to the web within 24 hours of its release. Starr's office really didn't care to publicize the report, probably because it was so lame.
Cool.
Allan may end up playing a significant role in American political history and I'm proud that he's a Freeper.
Nope. Clinton refused to send out a party. He just brushed it off. Others took care of wondering where the plane went.
When it came to a lost Kennedy plane, it was a different story.
This came up during the Kennedy thread, I'm sure.
See post #4. Wrong murder. I was mixing up Foster and Brown. Sorry for the err.
Excellent point. Even more curious is that everyone denied that he was depressed for the first week or so after his death. Then, all of a sudden, everyone got on the bandwagon with the depression story. Foster had been prescribed Trazodone, primarily to aid in sleeping. It's an extremely mild antidepressant at normal dosages. If he had truly complained about depression the doctor should have given him a stronger antidepressant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.