Skip to comments.
CA: Selling delay
Sac Bee ^
| 12/2/03
| Op/Ed
Posted on 12/02/2003 11:18:22 AM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:01:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is back on the campaign trail again this week, selling for his bonds plan. After five years of Gray Davis, who governed by holding his finger to the wind, it's good to see a governor out trying to build support for his program. The problem is that what Schwarzenegger is pushing isn't worth fighting for.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bond; calgov2002; catrans; delay; gopbigspender; kingpete; kingrepete; knife; schwarzenegger; selling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie
Now how is that fair! It's not fair, it's "Sacramento BEEZARRE"! Hahahaha!
21
posted on
12/02/2003 8:28:02 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Avoiding_Sulla; SierraWasp; ambrose
Now how is that fair??? Maybe we need a FareOpinion?
22
posted on
12/02/2003 8:38:19 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
To: NormsRevenge
23
posted on
12/02/2003 9:01:03 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
Schwarzenegger has linked his pass-the-buck bonds to a second proposal, which would place before voters in March a constitutional revision that would alter the state's existing spending cap in ways that would remove California's budget flexibility and invest the governor with virtually unlimited power.See the link above for the second proposal!
24
posted on
12/02/2003 9:02:28 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
To: gitmo
Sometimes you gotta do something to hold the creditors at baySounds good and even logical until you identify the main class of creditors. In this case they aren't the commercial vendors or the bondholders or the bankers or even it's present employees.
They are the entitled recently classes. The young, the poor, the ill, the elderly, the state retiree, the illegal resident.
California has more than enough cash flow to pay it's vendors, it's bond holders, it's accuring interest on it's debt, its employees and even to reimburse it's retirees for the cash they placed in their retirement accounts. In a word, even under the present circumstances, California is solvent if measured as a commercial enterprise.
It simply doesn't have the cash to sustain the recently entitled classes.
To: Carry_Okie
Maybe we need a FareOpinion? Well, seeing as hers is the distaff's side, would that make your suggestion that of the bus staff's side? [there's gotta be a pun that fits in there better than that -- I just can't give you a timely one tonight]
26
posted on
12/02/2003 11:57:24 PM PST
by
Avoiding_Sulla
(You can't see where we're going when you don't look where we've been.)
To: Amerigomag
I guess in the case of a state, the entitlements to the recently entitled are comparable to expenses. You are still obligated until you can change the law. In the meantime, you still gotta pay the bills.
27
posted on
12/03/2003 7:14:03 PM PST
by
gitmo
(Stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty. -GWB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson