Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tired_of_the_Lies
Really? I thought court records were covered. Certainly, the operative word is should.
12 posted on 12/03/2003 7:04:39 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Bird
Public access to court records is not covered by the FOIA, or at least wasn't a few years ago.

I can't speak definitively to how or why court records are open to the public, but it is likely derivitive. in criminal trials at least, of the accused right to a fair and open trial under the Constitution and, in both civil and criminal trials, partly to the right of freedom of the press.

Whtever the legal analysis, court records were generally open to the public long before the FOIA was enacted in the aftermath of Watergate.
13 posted on 12/03/2003 7:16:17 AM PST by Tired_of_the_Lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Bird
Really? I thought court records were covered. Certainly, the operative word is should.

It's usally defended in some lame 'seperation of powers' arguement.

17 posted on 12/03/2003 7:27:04 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson