More Krugman... stammering about the surging economy, this time... Unraveling.
To: Triple; tcostell; George W. Bush; Tamsey; Cyber Liberty; SupplySider; finnman69; lizbet; SAJ; ...
Krugman Truth Squad PING!
To: ReleaseTheHounds
G-d bless and keep the good and tireless warriors of the Krugman Truth Squad! :)
4 posted on
12/03/2003 2:09:17 PM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
The problem is, Diebold machines
can be hacked.
What is the urgency to have results by the damn 10 o'clock news anyway?
A paper trail ensures an honest election. Period. (Anybody remember chads? Numerous recounts validated the results. Not possible with pixels.)
Throwing out the baby with the bath water is foolish. Electronic voting is dangerous and stupid.
To: ReleaseTheHounds
This guy's lies are a bigger threat to the survival of this country than the terrorists are. A loose cannon of monsterous proportions.
8 posted on
12/03/2003 2:22:24 PM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(But maybe it's just my imagination.)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
In the smear-journalist's lexicon, "apparently" means "has not."In Krugman's defense, in post-Clinton America, "apparently" can mean "has not."
11 posted on
12/03/2003 2:44:51 PM PST by
kevao
To: ReleaseTheHounds
I'll tell you what that liar Krugman won't - that for right now, electronic voting machines are more of secure way to stop voter fraud, and without punch card vote fraud (or any vote fraud) in heavy democrat districts, the democrats will lose elections.
This is such a huge lie on massive proportions that he ought to be jailed.
To: ReleaseTheHounds
When someone says "this isn't about money," you can be sure it's all about money. And when Paul Krugman says "there's nothing paranoid about suggesting" something, you can be sure that what he's suggesting is a crackpot conspiracy theory built on lies and innuendo that only a true paranoid could believe.And when someone starts off an article trying to paint something with the tinfoil brush you can be sure they are trying to divert one's attention from something they prefer you don't look at too deeply.
Associating a danger to liberty with a kook (or to FReepers, with a Liberal) is a classic way to keep them from noticing the threat to themselves. Produce a piece of paper counted by both sides at the local level to ensure no fraud occurs. How hard is that to understand?
To: ReleaseTheHounds
When I first read Krugman's column, I KNEW there was an innocuous explantion for the "rob-Georgia.zip" folder name. How did I know? Because it was Krugman. (By the way, who is the "Bev Harris" referred to in the story? The author mentions her as if her identity is already known, but there was no prior reference to her.)
19 posted on
12/03/2003 3:21:48 PM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Curses! They're on to us. It's back to hiding the conservative dwarves inside the voting machines. It's just so difficult to out-evil the evil ones anymore.
To: ReleaseTheHounds
ping
28 posted on
12/03/2003 10:14:48 PM PST by
chmst
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson