[free me]

Ann is pointing out the the hypocripsy of the court in saying one has a right to "privacy" but only when it comes to abortion. The court believes we don't have a right to privacy when it comes to sawed-off shotguns, drugs, etc.

In no way does Ann give an opinion as to wether she believes these activities are constitutional.

[tpaine]

--- the decision in Roe v. Wade was a joke. The decision hinged on the convenient notion of "privacy," which, oddly enough, still fails to protect my right to manufacture methamphetamine, saw off shotgun barrels or euthanize the elderly, privately or otherwise.
-AnnC-

---

free me wrote:
Ann is pointing out the the hypocripsy of the court in saying one has a right to "privacy" but only when it comes to abortion.
The court believes we don't have a right to privacy when it comes to sawed-off shotguns, drugs, etc.
In no way does Ann give an opinion as to wether she believes these activities are constitutional.
-FM-

---

She claims above that our right to privacy is a joke, and that she doesn't have the right to "euthanize the elderly, privately or otherwise", nor the "right to manufacture methamphetamine, [or] saw off shotgun barrels".