Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Decides to Lift All Steel Tariffs
AP ^ | 12/04/03 | MARTIN CRUTSINGER

Posted on 12/04/2003 10:00:39 AM PST by Pikamax

Bush Decides to Lift All Steel Tariffs

Thursday December 4, 2003 5:16 PM

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER

AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Facing the threat of a trade war, President Bush has decided to lift all tariffs he imposed on foreign steel 20 months ago but will make permanent a beefed-up monitoring program to guard against a flood of foreign steel, congressional and industry sources said Thursday.

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick was scheduled to announce Bush's decision at midday. A congressional source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the White House was telling lawmakers that Bush had decided on a full repeal of the tariffs he imposed in March 2002. They had been scheduled to remain in place until March 2005.

During an Oval Office photo session with Jordan's King Abdullah II, Bush said he strongly believed that ``America's consumers, the American economy is better off with a world that trades freely and a world that trades fairly.''

Without revealing his decision, Bush said he had imposed the tariffs 20 months ago based on an International Trade Commission report that said America's steel industry was being hurt unfairly by imports. ``I acted to give the steel industry time to adjust,'' said Bush. He said his decision would be announced soon.

The White House asked key lawmakers from steel states to return to Washington for a briefing at the White House Thursday morning so they could be informed before the administration made Bush's decision public.

The president was acting to avert a threatened trade war with Europe and other big trading partners. Those nations had vowed to retaliate with punitive tariffs on American products unless the steel tariffs were removed.

The 15-nation European Union has vowed to retaliate against $2.2 billion of American products by mid-December unless the United States removes the steel tariffs, which were ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization. Japan and South Korea have also said they were considering retaliation.

The EU carefully chose its target list to cover a range of products from oranges to pajamas that would inflict maximum political pain in key swing states that Bush is hoping to win in next year's presidential race.

Bush was put in the difficult position of being forced to choose between angering businesses in those states or steelmakers in West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio, also considered crucial to Bush's re-election chances.

Bush's original tariff decision in March 2002 had unleashed a barrage of criticism from steel-consuming industries that claimed the higher prices they were forced to pay cost more jobs than were saved at U.S. steel plants.

Steel industry officials said the administration was reviewing a number of proposals to soften the blow of lifting the tariffs, which Bush had imposed at a time when the domestic industry was staggering from a string of bankruptcies and thousands of lost jobs that the industry blamed on a surge of foreign imports.

Among the proposals being considered by the administration was making permanent early reporting requirements to detect any big influx of steel into the United States.

The reporting program requires steel importers to apply for import licenses, giving the government a quicker way to detect possible import surges than waiting for Customs Service data when the steel arrives at U.S. ports.

The administration also was expected to pledge an aggressive use of U.S. antidumping laws to impose tariffs on specific steel products should imports surge once the tariffs are lifted.

The administration package also was expected to include pledges to continue pursuing global negotiations aimed at getting other countries to limit government subsidies for their domestic steel producers and to curb overcapacity in the steel industry.

Those talks, under way since 2002, so far have yielded little, and many trade experts don't hold out much hope that other countries will agree to U.S. demands in this area, given the political power their own steel industries wield.

A key discussion on the steel issue occurred Tuesday night when Bush met in the Oval Office with Vice President Dick Cheney, Commerce Secretary Don Evans and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick after returning from a fund-raising trip to Pittsburgh where he encountered last-minute lobbying from the steel industry urging him not to lift the tariffs.

Bush raised $850,000 for his re-election campaign at the Pittsburgh fund-raiser where one of his hosts was Thomas J. Usher, chief executive of U.S. Steel Corp., the nation's largest steel producer. Usher met with Bush to urge him to retain the tariffs.

Brink Lindsey, a trade expert at the Cato Institute, a Washington think tank, said the package the administration was assembling to replace the tariffs amounted to little more than a fig leaf for the domestic industry.

``The existence or nonexistence of an import monitoring system is not going to make that much difference,'' he said. ``And the pledge on more international talks is lip service as well. The talks haven't gone very far and they are not likely to go very far.''

---

Associated Press writers Scott Lindlaw and Lara Jakes Jordan contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: steeltariffs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2003 10:00:40 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The WTO is becoming a joke.
2 posted on 12/04/2003 10:06:24 AM PST by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
good
3 posted on 12/04/2003 10:09:33 AM PST by luckydevi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148
The WTO is becoming a joke.

Why is that?
4 posted on 12/04/2003 10:10:32 AM PST by ScudEast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; harpseal
Europe will still hate you, George.

Say, harpseal -- surprising isn't it how the economy grew at an 8+% annualized rate with steel tariffs. How can this possibly be?!?

;)
5 posted on 12/04/2003 10:11:47 AM PST by Tauzero (Avoid loose hair styles. When government offices burn, long hair sometimes catches on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
socionomics ping
6 posted on 12/04/2003 10:13:03 AM PST by Tauzero (Avoid loose hair styles. When government offices burn, long hair sometimes catches on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
I don't care what the eurinals think, I'm just happy that Bush will have to try to buy union support with his own money instead of mine.
7 posted on 12/04/2003 10:14:54 AM PST by dead (I used to believe in a lot of things. All of it! Now I believe only in dynamite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148
The WTO is becoming a joke.

No, the WTO is gaining legitimacy and authoritive power over national sovereignty.

It is our invertebrate POTUS who is the joke.

8 posted on 12/04/2003 10:31:44 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Sounds like that $850k bribe from the steel manufacturers wasn't enough. Nice to see that George took the money though.
9 posted on 12/04/2003 10:34:35 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
8-)
10 posted on 12/04/2003 10:37:14 AM PST by commonerX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
and what exactly do you think is going to be cheaper now? where was the evidence that prices of items made in the US with steel went higher?
11 posted on 12/04/2003 10:38:35 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
This kind of back-and-forth nonsense is the exact reason why the President wasn't given legislative powers by the Constitution. By what possible warped logic did he ever have the power to impose or withdraw any kind of tariff?
12 posted on 12/04/2003 10:42:36 AM PST by inquest (Government: Guilty until proven innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
By what possible warped logic did he ever have the power to impose or withdraw any kind of tariff?

Who has the power to impose tariffs? Who enacted it?
13 posted on 12/04/2003 10:43:54 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
ping
14 posted on 12/04/2003 10:45:11 AM PST by newgeezer (A conservative who conserves -- a true capitalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
ABC radio news reporting this will hurt the president in battleground states.

Ah, the wishing and hoping continues.

15 posted on 12/04/2003 10:46:37 AM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Looks like W blinked this time - too many electoral votes at stake. But, this was a no-win for the admin. no matter what they did once the rest of the world ganged up on us.
Every one of the complaining countries "dumps" steel here, but they've decided having a manufacturing base is good for their economies.
Perhaps now steel can get some of the special type of tax breaks oil, gas, and coal have been getting for decades.
16 posted on 12/04/2003 10:50:39 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
it will hurt in Ohio and PA, that's the truth. where will it help? nowhere. as other posters have said, the economy grew at 8% with steel tariffs in place.
17 posted on 12/04/2003 10:50:49 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lelio
According to the first sentence of the article, Bush did. Somehow.
18 posted on 12/04/2003 10:52:21 AM PST by inquest (Government: Guilty until proven innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
Why don't we just have the US gov't subsidize our steel industry to the same extent the eurinals do? It has the same net effect on US consumers....and has been "approved by the WTO"...
19 posted on 12/04/2003 10:52:22 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Principled
"Why don't we just have the US gov't subsidize our steel industry to the same extent the eurinals do? It has the same net effect on US consumers....and has been "approved by the WTO"...:

Too easy, makes too much sense, and steel doesn't have the same kind of friends as oil.
20 posted on 12/04/2003 10:54:19 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson