1 posted on
12/08/2003 8:41:09 PM PST by
flutters
To: flutters
Excellent post. Thanks, flutters.
2 posted on
12/08/2003 8:47:50 PM PST by
Judith Anne
(Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
To: backhoe; riri; Prince Charles; CathyRyan; torstars; BearWash; All
Ping
3 posted on
12/08/2003 8:50:12 PM PST by
Judith Anne
(Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
To: flutters
serious bump - and thanks, flutters.
5 posted on
12/08/2003 8:54:16 PM PST by
txhurl
To: flutters
Not compliant? Like picking up groceries? Doable, but not without thought.
"Our preference would be for people to stay at home," Dr. Layton said, echoing Dr. Iton of Alameda. "But we need alternatives in case people aren't compliant, and we've had teams identifying the kinds of facilities we might use."
6 posted on
12/08/2003 8:57:07 PM PST by
GOPJ
To: flutters
The buildings, he said, could house up to 100 people and could be guarded to keep anyone from leaving. It's not fair to keep sick people confined to two buildings when there are millions of people walking around perfectly healthy. More people must become infected to call attention to the plight of those who are suffering with the illness. Then and only then will justice be achieved.
Sound ridiculous? That pseudo-logic has been proven very effective.
7 posted on
12/08/2003 8:59:53 PM PST by
Barnacle
(Dickens knew.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson