Replies

Moslems from the middle-east are here. Better Norquist try to move moderate ones to support the GOP than to send them packing over to the DNC. If they weren't bad before the DNC were able to influence them, they certainly soon would be. I too do not believe this is a black and white issue at Norquist's expense.

I think Norquist believed the ones he was entertaining were the moderate ones. Hindsight is always 20/20.

Any human will be loyal to their God before all. If Norquist is a practicing religious Muslim he should never ever be trusted for even one second...ever again.

This is not my opinion BTW, it's a hard and very real fact of life.

Moslems from the middle-east are here. Better Norquist try to move moderate ones to support the GOP than to send them packing over to the DNC

The ones that Norquist has been dealing with have not been moderate ones, and this finally explains how extreme terrorist supporters keep getting invited to the White House.

Frankly, these extreme Islamists and the Democrats both want to change our Republic radically-- they belong together, if the Democrats will have them. These "leaders" that Norquist has been sucking up aren't going to be able to speak for any Muslim that can live in America on American terms. They want a Taliban here and they are the talibs.

I wonder if Norquist thought that he could be the last one put to the sword, or something... like the Judenrat in the ghettoes...

I don't know if you have seen a citizenship swearing-in in any of the Western countries. Something interesting happens. You can swear to God, or not, as your personal conscience dictates. Many Muslims, from their garb clearly observant of law and religious, universally opt for the non-religious oath. See, they don't want to swear loyalty before God -- they have no intention of being loyal.

The only way to beat radical Islam is with moderate Islam. None of the clerics that Grover has dragged into the White House, none of the organisation leaders, is remotely moderate. A moderate Muslim can render faith to his God and allegiance to our nation. An Islamist can't and won't -- as the trail of indictments shows.

Grover is a much bigger fish than Gaffney, so he may be inclined to think that he can just clam up and weather this one. Uh-uh. I want to hear his side of the story. Until he speaks, and until I see him explicitly reject terror supporters like al-Arian, CAIR, and the AMC, then his symbol goes on the sit-map in red: "enemy."

And as for BobJ's assertion that this was mostly before 9/11... Bob, read the article. Draw a line on a piece of paper and make a tick on the left of the line for a data point before 9/11 and a tick on the right for a data point after. Then, you might come around to see that, for Grover, "jooze got some 'splaining to do!" as Ricky used to tell Lucy.

I look forward to Grover's reply, and will read with an open mind, to a point. That point is that he must cut ties with Wahhabist, Islamist, terrorist supporters.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

.

I’m bumping this article to you because you were the first name on the thread that is still around. Kattracks of course is gone and the rest, I don’t know about.

This article is relevant to C-PAC.