Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If this was previously posted, I couldn't find it.
1 posted on 12/10/2003 1:51:06 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Unable to accept pilots carrying guns, the administration continues to float suggestions for Tasers...

More disinformation?

2 posted on 12/10/2003 1:52:26 AM PST by snopercod (The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Excuse me but anyone qualified to fly the damn plane is qualified to carry a weapon.
6 posted on 12/10/2003 2:00:40 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Pilots must also fly the airplane, but, with two pilots, one pilot would continue flying the plane while the other defended the entrance. In any case, if terrorists are in the cockpit, concentrating on flying will not be an option.

Actually most likely "George" the autopilot will be flying the plane under these conditions. Freeing both pilots to defend the cockpit.
9 posted on 12/10/2003 2:05:18 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Pilots of cargo jets should be required to carry.
21 posted on 12/10/2003 4:18:20 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
I believe pilots should be allowed to keep firearms in the cockpit. That being said, I also believe that it would be a near impossibility for any muslim terrorists to take over another American aircraft as they did in 2001. At that time, the mantra was "stay calm, give them what they want, nothing worse will happen". They caught the flight crews and passengers by surprise, cowing them into submission with extreme violence against passengers and crew, and having their way - until the word got out and on Flight 93 the crew and passengers resisted. Yes, they died, but the muslims did no further damage to structures and people on the ground.

Today, in the air, "stay calm" is not an option. Many passengers, in my experience, carefully eye boarding individuals, I know I look at everyone sitting in 1st class (I don't usually fly there), plus I look down the length of the cabin to see if there are any obviously arab or muslim elements. Especially to see if there are any seated together or in close proximity to one another and to cabin choke points. I keep potential weapons (carryon bag strap with buckle, two Uni-Ball fine point pens, my own belt with buckle) at the ready and "sleep" with one eye open. I look for individuals moving about the cabin and locate male passengers who I believe would be valuable allies in a tussle. It's up to us, people, to assure our own safety today. The US government, try as it may, cannot make things perfectly safe. But, I'm not about to let any muslims pricks take me and my family down without a fight to the death.

We are all Minutemen in this war, just like in 1776. It's the same thing now as then - a war for independence against Islam that we cannot lose.
23 posted on 12/10/2003 5:11:19 AM PST by astounded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
Our pilots should be armed as soon as possible. I think tasers should also be at their disposal, should they choose. However, the gun is necessary for the protection of the passengers.
26 posted on 12/10/2003 5:28:14 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: snopercod
About half the pilots applying for the program were rejected in the initial screening process. No explanations for those rejections have been provided, making the entire system unaccountable.

As usual, almost everything coming out of the TSA is insane. Bush needs to get over there and clean house before another airplane attack. This is a real trojan horse.

I would bet Federal Air Marshalls aren't as highly screened as most commercial pilots - nor after they are hired, are half consequently turned down for their most important duty!

There is an agenda at work here, and it has nothing to do with aircraft security.

28 posted on 12/10/2003 6:05:33 AM PST by Gritty ("Arms of individual citizens may be used at individual discretion in private self-defense-John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list
Bang
31 posted on 12/10/2003 7:56:54 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Police officials view armed citizens like teachers union bosses view homeschoolers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson