Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FIRST SHOT IN DEMS' CIVIL WAR
New York Post ^ | 12/10/03 | Deborah Orin

Posted on 12/10/2003 2:15:42 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:47 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

December 10, 2003 -- AL GORE made it crystal clear yesterday that one of his prime goals in endorsing Howard Dean for president is to kiss Bill Clinton's Democratic Party goodbye. "We need to remake the Democratic Party," Gore said as he threw his support to Dean at a breakfast just down the street from Clinton's Harlem office and gave the front-runner a big boost toward the 2004 Democratic nomination.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; algore; dean; dems; dnc; hillary; howarddean; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/10/2003 2:15:42 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Oh Al, yer p*ssing-off the wrong she-beast!


2 posted on 12/10/2003 2:30:20 AM PST by gorebegone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I sense a "Political Rally" coming on for algore - has he any children who could shout "We will win We will win!" - don't go getting into any small planes now will ya al!
3 posted on 12/10/2003 2:35:11 AM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free_at_last_-2001
Naah, this is the puppet masters making the rank and file dance to their own little tune. Just wait and see what happens. We could be looking at a Gore/Clinton ticket yet.
4 posted on 12/10/2003 2:47:58 AM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gorebegone
Is that Helen Thomas before she puts her makeup on.
5 posted on 12/10/2003 2:49:39 AM PST by doosee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We need to remake the Democratic Party," Why pick the 60's?

Well, if anyone should know about "remake" it would be ol' Al. He has been remade more x than I can remember.

I find Rangel backing Wesley Clark interesting, .

But I would rather know who the swimmer is backing! And I think it is still Kennedy's Bill Clinton's Democratic Party.

6 posted on 12/10/2003 2:53:20 AM PST by malia (BUSH/CHENEY '04 *A Cherished Constitutional right - the right to vote and have it counted - once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
cat fight!.... uh, dog fight! ....uh,gerbil fight!
7 posted on 12/10/2003 2:53:39 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free_at_last_-2001


OPERATION BAD MEDICINE





DOCTOR DEATH INC


- THE DNC PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION NETWORK -


8 posted on 12/10/2003 2:55:43 AM PST by autoresponder (<html> <center> <img src="http://0access.web1000.com/HV.gif"> </center> </html> HILLARY SHOOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free_at_last_-2001
- has he any children who could shout "We will win We will win!" -

How about Karenna in a 'home video' with Paris Hilton?

They could call it "Elites Gone Wild!" ;-)

9 posted on 12/10/2003 2:59:21 AM PST by StriperSniper (The "mainstream" media is a left bank oxbow lake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
Politics is such a variable and changing monstrocity. As the Republicans move to the left, the Demoncrats have to move farther left to create issues to take to the voters. Both parties could possibly wind up in the lap of the NSP (National Socialist Party).
10 posted on 12/10/2003 3:31:04 AM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Both parties could possibly wind up in the lap of the NSP (National Socialist Party).

It's getting close.

Check out this in the continuing Washington quest for total control:

Hillary Clinton Joins Fight for National Seatbelt Law

11 posted on 12/10/2003 3:37:17 AM PST by StriperSniper (The "mainstream" media is a left bank oxbow lake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The few remaining Democrats who are not at the mercy of the fever of putting Herself in the White House may possibly succeed in only managing to put the Democrat party in the ditch for several years, not allowing it to plunge into the abyss.

There will be several years before the Democrats can expunge their ranks of this poison, a suppurating infection that has sapped their strength and ability to reason logically. There was an opportunity, back in 1998, to purge themselves then, by demanding the focus of the infected thinking resign from office. But party was vastly more important than principle. They may lose power, doncha know.

The Republicans had gone through a similar devastation in 1974, when the Republican leadership of the House and Senate marched down Pennsylvania Avenue and demanded that Nixon resign, to avoid an almost-certain impeachment hearing. For this, the Republicans wandered in the wilderness for the span of the Carter Administration, but recovered to the degree that Ronaldus Magnus brought the American people, and the Republican party, back to respectability.

In one important aspect, it makes no difference whether a bad Chief Executive is removed from office or not. The party to which he belongs will suffer the consequences for years. If the departure is voluntary, the years will be shortened. But if the situation is fraught with denials and resistance, and the object of the political fight, clearly in the wrong, insists on standing ground despite overwhelming evidence of incompetence and mendacity, it will take far longer to reestablish trust and plausibility with the American people.

Repent, Democrats. You may never understand or agree with the positions taken by those whom you consider to be "righteous", but base your opposition on something more logical than blind and unreasoned defense of the incompetence of the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001". They have been false prophets, and have failed you miserably.
12 posted on 12/10/2003 4:00:40 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Excellent analysis at your #12.
13 posted on 12/10/2003 4:05:15 AM PST by Rebelbase (Diaparerne is crucial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Free_at_last_-2001
Ron Brown's plane wasn't that small...
14 posted on 12/10/2003 4:17:30 AM PST by DB ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gorebegone
Oh Al, yer p*ssing-off the wrong she-beast!

Oh my goodness! I nearly fell out of my chair laughing when I saw this...

15 posted on 12/10/2003 5:11:52 AM PST by Kenton (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DB
Republican Senator Inhofe's plane was small, a single-engine private craft. Fortunately he survived the loss of his propeller - an almost unheard-of failure, btw - and landed safely.

Just goes to show how much the Clintons hate to be accused of treason.

16 posted on 12/10/2003 5:22:32 AM PST by Mackey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: malia
I find Rangel backing Wesley Clark interesting...

I find Clark's pondering the Beast as a running mate to be hilarious and extrememly short-sighted.

I'm sure the Presidency is important to Clark, but is it really worth getting to savor the Oval Office for 10 minutes before contracting the Arkansas Flu?

17 posted on 12/10/2003 5:32:30 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gorebegone
just reinventing reinventing, which he invented, anyway, right after the internet....
18 posted on 12/10/2003 5:35:56 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (The evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Pass the popcorn, please. I just can't get enough of "Democrats Behaving Badly." It's my favorite show on television.
19 posted on 12/10/2003 5:36:36 AM PST by massadvj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
re #12--great post!
20 posted on 12/10/2003 5:47:57 AM PST by proud American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson