[elfman2]

This is the second time I’ve seen you post from writers on obscure web sites that can’t reason their way out of a paper bag.

The title is Bush's “Betrayal” of Evangelicals, but the only support is that he “owns” them for agreeing with him on the war so if he doesn’t push through the rest of their social agenda it’s a betrayal. The article’s an unfocused wandering piece of garbage from an unfocused fuzzy thinker.

[JohnGalt]

Most conservatives and libertarians have herd of LewRockwell.com which is why the get more web traffic than FR.

I take it you are neither?