To: Dane
I'm confused.........
How does casting a vote, in a presidential election, for Charlton Heston instead of a "big party" candidate, add a single vote for the democrat?
It doesn't.
The entire argument over "not voting for bush is a vote for gore" is a falshood.
59 posted on
12/11/2003 11:22:02 AM PST by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
To: WhiteGuy
not at the moment.
at the moment, there is no viable third party. No third party has significant power bases in local, state, or federal government.
to vote for a third-party candidate for the presidency at the moment is exactly the same as not voting at all: there is absolutely NO CHANCE that candidate will win. In that perspective, the failure to vote for Bush subtracts one vote from his tally, which is the same as if a vote is added to the demonrat candidate.
I am no die-hard Dubyaite, but he beats ALL of the demonrat alternatives by a long mile.
64 posted on
12/11/2003 11:27:05 AM PST by
King Prout
(...he took a face from the ancient gallery, then he... walked on down the hall....)
To: WhiteGuy
Plus the fact that there were the "undecided" people that voted for Perot, they might have voted Bush or the might have voted Clinton.
88 posted on
12/11/2003 11:40:40 AM PST by
looscnnn
("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson