Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
I'm confused.........

How does casting a vote, in a presidential election, for Charlton Heston instead of a "big party" candidate, add a single vote for the democrat?

It doesn't.

The entire argument over "not voting for bush is a vote for gore" is a falshood.

59 posted on 12/11/2003 11:22:02 AM PST by WhiteGuy (Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: WhiteGuy
not at the moment.
at the moment, there is no viable third party. No third party has significant power bases in local, state, or federal government.
to vote for a third-party candidate for the presidency at the moment is exactly the same as not voting at all: there is absolutely NO CHANCE that candidate will win. In that perspective, the failure to vote for Bush subtracts one vote from his tally, which is the same as if a vote is added to the demonrat candidate.
I am no die-hard Dubyaite, but he beats ALL of the demonrat alternatives by a long mile.
64 posted on 12/11/2003 11:27:05 AM PST by King Prout (...he took a face from the ancient gallery, then he... walked on down the hall....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: WhiteGuy
Plus the fact that there were the "undecided" people that voted for Perot, they might have voted Bush or the might have voted Clinton.
88 posted on 12/11/2003 11:40:40 AM PST by looscnnn ("Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils" Gen. John Stark 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson