Web school teaches porn site how-to

CNN ^ | Thursday, December 11, 2003 Posted: 9:29 AM EST (1429 GMT) | By Jeordan Legon

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Force the smut peddlers to use a .xxx or .prn and we'll see how much money they'll make.

[the invisib1e hand]

Would you rather have these people working or drawing either unemployment or welfare? I am all for working instead of sucking up my taxes.

hm. wonder what you'd say if it was your daughter getting gang banged.

[the invisib1e hand]

problem here is the supply-side economics effect. the existence creates the demand, and of course, the need for 'raw materials.'

coming soon: how to recruit local teens for your site?

where's my %$#&^%*&'ing duct-tape?

[.cnI redruM]

If I told him I've got his raw material right here, he'd probably take it the wrong way. This guy makes me want to Chomsky my lunch all over the keyboard. He should go johnFkerry himself and sell that on DVD.

[StriperSniper]

Maybe we could get them to allow prime-time porn during election season...

...and put subliminal political messages in them. ;-)

[little jeremiah]

Endemic pornography of the most extreme types including bestiality, group efforts and homosexuality as well as bondage and so on is not a good influence. Previously in history stuff that gross was a) not widely disseminated through mass media and b)the kind of wall decorations you're thinking of are not is the same realm. At all.

You like a world where there are absolutely no limits to sexual expression no matter how disgusting, violent, depraved or perverted the content. That's your position (apprently). Fine. My position is different. We disagree. But you can't force me into a false position, or try to equate your position as one that has any historical validity or precedent.

[.cnI redruM]

Which party will screw you harder? :)

[eno_]

Did I say "no limits?" Did I venture into realms that are "disgusting?"

Sexual imagry was always part of life. Get over it.

[little jeremiah]

You don't like to debate issues in an adult manner, do you? It's "get over it" and so on. Either you are being purposely obtuse, or your support of pornography is purely academic and you've never:
A. Seen any (highly unlikely) or
B. Read about it.

I, believe it or not, have never seen any pornography except a few Playboy pictures in the 60s. But I have read about the kind of pornography that is common and endemic - on internet, TV, etc. It is not just "sexual images". The porn industry is rife with perverted, highly disgusting, violent stuff as well as a lot of child porn. That you are a staunch defender of this sick filth, making the lame excuse that "it's always been around" is a transparent disclosure of who you are.

I think you may need some help.