[ImpBill]

I too agree, but one thing the author leaves out is that a number of staunch conservatives are really perplexed concerning GW's domestic agenda on many fronts. True most will vote for him as it is not safe to have a Democrat in office and yet ...

How many more actions can he take that fly in the face of the once traditional conservative Republican base before enough of them decide to "sit it out"? If the election will be as close as this author suggests I am glad I am not in charge of the Ouija board when recommending which bed rock conservative values to trash for votes from the moderate (lack of core principles) middle.

[Dan from Michigan]

If he signs the AW ban, I'm out. That's my breaking point.

[gitmo]

I find myself torn about President Bush. I thank God he was in the WH when the 2nd attack on the World Trade Center took place. The previous administration made speeches when they attacked the first time, but did nothing about that attack nor the other attacks on our country by the terrorists.

I admire Bush's character. He is plain spoken and seems to be a man of his word.

But his domestic record has scary things in it. The tax cuts are good, but too timid in the approach. The Drug Bill that was just passed is terrible. The CFR law he signed is the antithesis of American principles. The education bill and the farm bill were both awful.

But I cannot see any of the Rat candidates in the White House. We are in a world war, defending ourselves against an invading force, and Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are the right men to lead us in the prosecution of this thing. This is a different war than any we have been in before and we need men who will fight the enemy in ways that have never been used before.