1 posted on
12/15/2003 4:56:05 AM PST by
Crazieman
To: Crazieman
Some Dim:
Bush could cure cancer and I'd still hate him.That pretty much sums it up - it doesn't matter what W does or does not do - they hate him more that they hate Sadaam, who killed MILLIONS of his own people.
2 posted on
12/15/2003 5:24:27 AM PST by
4CJ
('Scots vie 4 tavern juices' - anagram by paulklenk, 22 Nov 2003)
To: Crazieman
The benefits of capturing Saddam seem vastly outweighed by the increased danger posed by Bush insofar as Bush's reelection chances are enhanced by the capture.It's hard to believe that this is a DU poster, admitting that Dubya was elected. Probably a troll that was banned immediately after this remark.
To: Crazieman
I have only one thing to say about the above list....
Not one person there has ever suffered in any way, shape or form...period...
(Granted, probably to them, going without a hot shower one day is suffering).
Talk about vapid and shallow!
5 posted on
12/15/2003 5:34:01 AM PST by
najida
(Nope, this isn't breaking news either. Come back after dinner.)
To: Crazieman
Have you poor folks been trying to register at democraticunderground.com.? The registration has been suspended. I think someone may be getting freeped. The pain they must be suffering, hearing another side of the story. Keep up the good work.
6 posted on
12/15/2003 5:35:15 AM PST by
em2vn
To: Crazieman
bump
8 posted on
12/15/2003 6:24:13 AM PST by
jonno
To: Crazieman
"The timing of this thing just seems way too convenient. Bush, down in the polls - having to face questions not just about the war but also about the economy and our international standing. Dean, riding high, starting to attract the NASCAR dads the media thinks are the key to this election. Even Bush's media events are torn to pieces as the shams they are."
The insanity required to write this text is astounding. Totally deranged. I really liked the part about Dean starting to attract NASCAR Dads. Yup and George Bush is getting an endorsement from Ed Assner.
11 posted on
12/15/2003 7:21:35 AM PST by
faithincowboys
( Zell Miller is the only DC Democrat not commiting treason.)
To: Crazieman
One DU poster posted this:
"At left: Saddam Hussein? At right: one of Saddam's many alleged body doubles? Consider the eyebrows: In the man on the left the right eyebrow appers to slant upwards, on the man on the right the right eyebrow slants downwards. The moustache: darker on the man on the left than on the man on the right? The ears: a definite bow in the middle of the ears of the man on the left. While in the man on the right the ear is partially obscured there is perhaps enough visible to see that the bow in the middle is absent?"
The problem is, the idiot poster wasn't smart enough to realize that the picture on the left was taken right after Saddam was shaved, shortly after the picture on the right was taken. Look at the background. You can even see the same scab over his left eyebrow. What a hoot.
12 posted on
12/15/2003 8:53:37 AM PST by
Jaxter
("When they come for your guns, give 'em your ammo first.")
To: Crazieman
Rush just read Boortz's DU quoted verbatim, and claimed that he [Rush] had found them himself.
13 posted on
12/15/2003 10:40:27 AM PST by
snopercod
(The federal government will spend $21,000 per household in 2003, up from $16,000 in 1999.)
To: Crazieman
"... against Saddam's capture. He may be an evil man but he should be allowed to run his country the way he wishes to run it."
The best...
To: Crazieman
"There is no good from this war, only suffering."
I'd like to ask the folks at DU if they think the American Civil War was morally justified. After all, it had exponentially more casualties than the Iraq war.
18 posted on
12/15/2003 1:17:44 PM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson