Skip to comments.
Giving Thomas Jefferson the Business:
The Jefferson-Hemings Hoax
A Different Drummer/Middle American News ^
| December, 2003
| Nicholas Stix
Posted on 12/16/2003 11:18:44 AM PST by mrustow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
To: John Robertson
It matters. The truth always matters. Something is or it isn't, and dissemblers and liars shouldn't be given a pass on manipulating a COUNTRY! Yes, but we will never know what the TRUTH of this matter is. The 'facts' in the article above are no more definitive than the claims of the other side.
Neither side has anything but allegations and vague statistics.
Does either position make Thomas Jefferson less of a great man, indeed a Renaissance Man, and patriot?
So9
41
posted on
12/16/2003 12:10:41 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Think of it as Evolution In Action)
To: VRWCmember
I think there is a third side: one that neither seeks to elevate TJ to sainthood, nor to morph Hemmings into the image of some fictional character, but rather hopes to have the historical record left intact without politically correct revisionism.I agree. I would prefer provable fact in place of the ongoing speculation. However it turns out matters not to me. If Tom and Sally were an item, I hope they both enjoyed the relationship. It is not right that a great man or a humble slave be lonely. OTOH, if Jefferson was true in life to Martha, let it be known. It won't make him a saint. Those of us who have spent the time to read about Jefferson know he was just a man. As remarkable as he may be to our history and Republic.
42
posted on
12/16/2003 12:11:30 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: petitfour
I think your professor was undoubtedly right. I think the solid preponderance of the evidence establishes Thomas Jefferson is not the father the Hemmings children. I'm not sure why you see it as an open question when an historian you respect, who dislikes Jefferson but looked at all the evidence carefully, concludes Jefferson could not have been the father.
What I find interesting is that our actual understanding after the Blue Ribbon Commission, hasn't really advanced much from what Dumas Malone wrote some 50 years ago: it was a Jefferson male, but almost certainly not Thomas.
43
posted on
12/16/2003 12:15:06 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: elbucko
A little known fact is when Sally went to Paris she could have stayed behind. France had a law that any slave who landed on french soil was free, sort of like our wet foot-dry foot policy. To me she had to love him to go back to America and being a slave.
44
posted on
12/16/2003 12:16:54 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: ClearCase_guy
In short: this is useful as a smear on a great American. I don't see that.
At the time this may have occurred, Sally Hemmings was Thomas Jeffersons Property.
Anything he may or may not have done was neither illegal nor immoral in that context.
That it may be illegal or immoral today is irrelevant.
It did not happen today.
Therefore there can be no smear.
So9
45
posted on
12/16/2003 12:17:05 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Think of it as Evolution In Action)
To: dion
How him possibly sleeping with Sally Hemmings in any way voids his contributions to this country is beyond me. (Ironically these same people would argue that the Monica Lewinsky scandal didn't matter because it was only about sex.) :) That certainly bears repeating!
2 key ideas are here: First, that what Jefferson did on behalf of this country stands on its own as the product of his intellect and his character. The words and warning that are his real legacy to this country and the world are true no matter what he may or may not have done in his private life. Second, one must ALWAYS look to the motivation of those who seek to tear down an individual. In this case it is clear that smearing so revered a figure as TJ is the perfect way to excuse allegedly similar behavior by WJC.
To: cyborg
The Jefferson buckled shoe in black patent leather. Simple, elegant without making a big fuss about it. Men's sizes 7-14.
47
posted on
12/16/2003 12:18:26 PM PST
by
ffusco
(Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
To: ffusco
LOL... actually his shirt was more like a little dress on me.
48
posted on
12/16/2003 12:19:40 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: CatoRenasci
It is all VERY silly and merely a reflection of the worthless level of academic games these days.
One can't even blame it on Black Americans. They may be this age's reigning criminal class (it has been Irish and Italians at other times), but academia is forever trying to lower the standards for them down to whatever level allows them to crawl into college, having been cheated out of a decent public education.
So why not spread sheer nonsense like this as received history? Good for their self-esteem.
49
posted on
12/16/2003 12:21:19 PM PST
by
Clodia Pulcher
(There can be no more overpaid profession than "education...")
To: petitfour
The story about Jefferson having mistresses in Paris (this was after the death of his wife) is almost certainly true: he was celebrated in France and moved in the highest social circles and most elite
salons, and many attractive aristocratic women wanted him.
An interesting comment on Sally comes, as you may recall, from Abigail Adams, who met Sally in London as she accompanied Jefferson's daughter to France (sometime after Jefferson). Adams thought she was an immature teen-aged child, hardly able to act effectively as Miss Jefferson's servant. Sally apparently was given the opportunity for some education during her time in Paris. (That would be consistent with her being Jefferson's wife's half-sister). Those who knew her and knew Jefferson at the time found the notion of an affair (alleged by Callendar) risable.
50
posted on
12/16/2003 12:21:50 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: tcuoohjohn
The phenomenon of interracial progeny in was, if not common, then frequent enough for commentators of the day to note it.Why constrain the phenomenon to times past. Why, even now, I'd rather be the bastard son of Jefferson and Hemmings, than the legitimate offspring of Bill and Hillary Clinton.
51
posted on
12/16/2003 12:21:57 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: yankhater
Thomas Jefferson ping. What are your thoughts re: Reply No. 10?
To: CatoRenasci
Excellent summary. But, as you see, even from postings here, no proof is all proof for those who want to or are predisposed to believe the fable regardless of the lack of any incontovertible proof.
53
posted on
12/16/2003 12:25:09 PM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: elbucko
ABC anyone but clinton
54
posted on
12/16/2003 12:25:34 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: cyborg
LOL..
55
posted on
12/16/2003 12:27:24 PM PST
by
elbucko
To: centurion316
Ping, pass to the Jefferson cousins
To: *CCRM; Peacerose; Shermy; seamole; Fred25; Free ThinkerNY; ouroboros; ChaseR; A.J.Armitage; ...
Ping!
57
posted on
12/16/2003 12:31:32 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: Clodia Pulcher
I agree, and am very glad I am not in academia any more. (Though, sometimes I feel guilty at having left and deserted the field to the likes of these leftist scum!) My specialized field was the Enlightenment, so I have spent more than a fair amount of time on the Founding Fathers, especially Jefferson, and did some research in respect of his sojourn in France. IMHO, there is no way TJ was involved with Hemmings when he had his pick of the beauties of the French Court. But, you can't tell the truth to people who don't understand how to evaluate historical evidence and expect them to believe you.
58
posted on
12/16/2003 12:33:25 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: codeword; dennisw; veronica; onyx; Diogenesis; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Pokey78; rockfish59; ...
Heads-up!
59
posted on
12/16/2003 12:33:36 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: CatoRenasci
Hubby and I are usually inclined to agree with our dear, distinguished professor. However, I do not buy the Jefferson was an old man theory and incapable of carrying on with the nanny. After visiting Monticello, we had a different sense of Jefferson. I could certainly use with more study, however.
Speaking of Monticello, I would recommend to anyone who wants to know about American history to go there. Jefferson's vision for this new nation came from the vision he could see atop his mountain. Beautiful place. And that is an understatement.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-214 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson