Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Verginius Rufus
What?! The New York Times was WRONG!? Say it isn't so.
5 posted on 12/17/2003 1:58:40 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well....there you go again...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
What?! The New York Times was WRONG?!...

This is believed to be the first and last time...

8 posted on 12/17/2003 2:16:37 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
What?! The New York Times was WRONG!? Say it isn't so.

There is no better time to kick someone that when he is down. Maybe they should leave aeronautics to the experts.

New York Times Editorial, 1920

As a method of sending a missile to the higher, and even to the highest parts of the earth's atmospheric envelope, Professor Goddard's rocket is a practicable and therefore promising device. It is when one considers the multiple-charge rocket as a traveler to the moon that one begins to doubt ... for after the rocket quits our air and really starts on its journey, its flight would be neither accelerated nor maintained by the explosion of the charges it then might have left.

Professor Goddard, with his "chair" in Clark College and countenancing of the Smithsonian Institution, does not know the relation of action to reaction, and of the need to have something better than a vacuum against which to react ... Of course he only seems to lack the knowledge ladled out daily in high schools.

9 posted on 12/17/2003 2:42:37 PM PST by KarlInOhio (A little bloodletting and some boar's vomit, and he'll be fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson