Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/17/2003 5:23:35 PM PST by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Hal1950
Kean's showboating.

Bush should stonewall on the records now, more than ever.

And fire Kean.

2 posted on 12/17/2003 5:26:24 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
CBS goes for the juglar quickly after the capture of Saddam.
They deftly change from the pre-report to the accusations of the bereaved w/o missing a beat conflating the two concepts. Good hit job by Dan's boys.
3 posted on 12/17/2003 5:28:07 PM PST by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
I wonder how Mrs. Breitweiser feels about Bill Clinton's refusal to accept Bin Laden's extradition from the Sudan?
4 posted on 12/17/2003 5:28:09 PM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
... and your opinion would be?
6 posted on 12/17/2003 5:30:11 PM PST by glock rocks (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
The widows want to know why various government agencies didn't connect the dots before Sept. 11, such as warnings from FBI offices in Minnesota and Arizona about suspicious student pilots.

Want answers, ladies? Read Invasion by Michelle Malkin. She exposes how political correctness and the bleeding hearts put us in such a position.

7 posted on 12/17/2003 5:30:12 PM PST by Schatze (It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
This is dumb. I would bet there's nobody in the world except a couple of rappers and a few dozen terrorists would even have considered the possiblity that people would coordinate an attack by hijacking 4 (5? 6? 7?) planes at the same time and flying them into prominent buildings. That's just nuts and nobody can predict nutty behavior.
8 posted on 12/17/2003 5:31:36 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
Open all records now or else we will have another Watergate or worse.
9 posted on 12/17/2003 5:31:43 PM PST by Papabear47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
The DUmmies are having multiple orgasms over this.
12 posted on 12/17/2003 5:33:07 PM PST by mondonico (Peace through Superior Firepower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
Interesting timing.
13 posted on 12/17/2003 5:33:49 PM PST by wizardoz ("Let's roll!" ........................................................ "We got him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
I'm wondering how much the press will leave out. I mean the part where Clinton had several opportunities to capture Osama Bin Laden but never did.
15 posted on 12/17/2003 5:34:27 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
What about the counterpoint?
17 posted on 12/17/2003 5:34:57 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Your joy is your sorrow unmasked." --- GIBRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
I didn't see anything in this article that hasn't already been public for the last two years. What's the point of CBS packaging it up like this? It's old news...
19 posted on 12/17/2003 5:35:52 PM PST by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
Everything is "preventable". The question is, was it reasonably preventable? That is, was there negligence, or would there really have had to have been an extrodinary (unreasonable) effort?

Also, what would the timeframe for this effort have been? Are we talking a year to prevent (meaning that Clinton would have had to have started the effort).

This report conveys no relevent information.
22 posted on 12/17/2003 5:36:22 PM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
So is this investigation only going back to January 20, 2001? What about the 8 years of Clinton, or the Carter administration, or the 1972 Munich Games, or the Six-Day war, or maybe 1948 when Israel was founded?

I guess it all depends on who they want to blame.

23 posted on 12/17/2003 5:36:27 PM PST by ILBBACH (God did Bless us...every one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
You got to be kidding me!!!! GW after 7.5 months in office is responsible for the previous 8 years of mis-management of our CIA, FBI and the US MILITARY. He wasn't even able to appoint a new FBI Director until ONE WEEK before 911 because of the election delay. If Chairman KEAN blames GW for this I will go balistic. I am sick of this!!
25 posted on 12/17/2003 5:36:30 PM PST by PISANO (God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
"The widows want to know why various government agencies didn't connect the dots before Sept. 11, such as warnings from FBI offices in Minnesota and Arizona about suspicious student pilots."

Mainly, because these "various government agencies" were prohibited from sharing informaton with each other prior to 9/11. I getta kick out these libs who bitch about the shortcomings in the system, when it is their paranoia and hostility that has created many of these obstructions, in the first place. These same people who moan about the intelligence failures are the same people who supported the decimation of these intelligence agencies from the Church Commission to the Torecelli Amendment.
Even now, as we make changes to the system to elliviate some of these errors, we still have the usual suspects up in arms, objecting to those changes.
30 posted on 12/17/2003 5:38:47 PM PST by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Everything is "preventable". The question is, was it reasonably preventable? That is, was there negligence, or would there really have had to have been an extrodinary (unreasonable) effort?

Also, what would the timeframe for this effort have been? Are we talking a year to prevent (meaning that Clinton would have had to have started the effort).

This report conveys no relevent information.
35 posted on 12/17/2003 5:41:14 PM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
>>...we had FBI records from 1991 stating that this is a possibility...<<

Lessee....who was President for eight years after that??? And this guy's blaming Bush??

37 posted on 12/17/2003 5:42:31 PM PST by FReepaholic (Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dog
9/11 Chair says attacks were preventable. A ping for your reading displeasure.
42 posted on 12/17/2003 5:44:03 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hal1950
"There are people that, if I was doing the job, would certainly not be in the position they were in at that time because they failed. They simply failed," Kean said.

===

Starting with Bill Clinton. If he had taken Bin Laden, when Sudan offered OBL, 9-11 would never have happened.

Then we can go on, that if we never let a single Muslim into the US, the attack could also have been prevented.

Short of that, anything they say is all 20/20 hindsight.

43 posted on 12/17/2003 5:44:07 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson