To: FairOpinion
PFFFT...Arnold was more than willing to sign anything. He didn't even try to "negotiate" with the Dems. He basically told the Republicans to take a hike.
Arnold didn't "learn" anything, he was a willing accomplice.
5 posted on
12/17/2003 10:38:51 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
To: Fledermaus
"Arnold didn't "learn" anything, he was a willing accomplice."
===
Ah, the Arnold bashing is starting...
I wasn't going to bring this up, but since you started to bash Arnold.
Note the positive tone of Haynes article, vs. the whiny, accusatory, unrealistic, unhelpful tone of the McClintock articles and compare the two.
Haynes is a conservative looking for solution, McClintock claims to be conservative, but all he does is obstructs, but has no realistic solutions.
To: Fledermaus; FairOpinion; Poohbah
You've got it right. The fans of Arnold will have trouble facing that Arnold spit in the faces of the GOP legislators by negotiating behind their backs. Only 2 GOP state senators (Brulte and his heir apparent) backed Arnold's deal; the rest opposed it. Forget fiscal reform in California for a while.
I can't wait for Arnold to support drivers licenses for illegal aliens next year (of course with stricter security provisions; ha, ha, ha). Arnold's fans are in for a LONG THREE YEARS.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson