Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: camle
Actually, there are some on both sides who do not equate the two. One side objects to Saddam being executed, but defends the "Right to Abortion". The other side exactly the opposite.

And the issue of guild, of whether there is Good and Evil, defined by a power higher than us mortals, is at the heart of this strange result.

Those who believe in a Higher Power understand that we should use the power vested in us by that Higher Power, to further Good and fight Evil. There are crimes worthy of the death penalty, and surely if anyone is guilty of such crimes, Saddam is.

Those who don't so believe, the secularists and amoral atheists, conclude that it is Wrong to make such Moral Judgements. Taking the life of an unborn child is acceptable, because it is simply an act of convenience for the mother, not a moral judgement on the child. Taking the life of Saddam is wrong, for the very reason that it is being justified on Moral grounds.

Strange - one side finds that the more guilty the victim, the more justified the murder, while the other side finds that the more innocent the victim, the more acceptable the murder.

46 posted on 12/18/2003 1:55:56 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: ThePythonicCow
Wow. That's it. I've never heard it like that before--

"Death penalty is wrong because it is a moral judgment."
"Abortion is okay because it isn't a moral judgment."

Totally explains it. And really creeps the $#it outta me.
52 posted on 12/18/2003 2:19:07 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson