Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COURT: RIAA CAN'T HAVE NAMES OF DOWNLOADERS
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 12/19/2003 7:38:57 AM PST by rit

Federal appeals court on Friday rejected efforts by recording industry to compel nation's Internet providers to identify subscribers accused of illegally distributing music online.

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: haha; riaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-391 next last
To: Grit
Coupling isn't music. It's a TV show on BBC. Does the RIAA control TV shows on BBC too?
161 posted on 12/19/2003 10:47:44 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Grit
The RIAA gets a cut from CDRs too.
162 posted on 12/19/2003 10:49:21 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
RIAA should be dismantled and an industry group with vision should be formed.

Quite the opposite, they're even now lobbying Congress for antitrust exemptions after the Napster judge seemed to like suggestions that the RIAA was violating antitrust laws. If they get that, there's no stopping them.

163 posted on 12/19/2003 10:49:38 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
Actually, all downloaders are criminals, per copyright law.

This is false on its face. Only downloading copywrited material is criminalized.

164 posted on 12/19/2003 10:49:48 AM PST by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs
"I wouldn't say you are in the minority amongst conservatives, maybe amongst libertarians who think they should have the liberty to steal music online.

What, you just automatically agree w/ the RIAA's interpretation of the fair use rule?

165 posted on 12/19/2003 10:49:57 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jayef
I am not a thief...

I bet you consider J.Rob a thief when he allows posters to reproduce articles on his website for discussion, no? So who did you side with when The Washington Post, LA Times, and MSNBC filed suit against this website?

166 posted on 12/19/2003 10:51:34 AM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
I then went to a pawn shop and bought Toy Story for 5 bucks.

Next step for the MPAA: Kill the secondary market through licensing and technological controls. Don't think the failed DIVX was was the last we've heard of that.

167 posted on 12/19/2003 10:52:01 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
"Actually, all downloaders are criminals, per copyright law"

So everyone who has a song out there automatically copyrights it? A friend of mine made a track of his garage band playing a song. I downloaded it. So I am automatically a criminal? Even though I had been asked by him to download it and listen to it? If you think that is illegal, tell me exactly why.
168 posted on 12/19/2003 10:55:03 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
I'm generally against theft. AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THE RIAA IS SUPPORTING! Price gouging is a form of theft. I won't be crying in my beer over this decision.
169 posted on 12/19/2003 10:57:03 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jayef
Thumbs up to you for appreciating your audience for enjoying your work.
170 posted on 12/19/2003 10:57:43 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
And they claim music sales are down.

I believe they are right. There was an analysis on the web a while ago showing that the number of titles released is also way down. Hmmmm, coincidence?

171 posted on 12/19/2003 10:59:20 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs
Its copyright infringement-a civil matter.
Not theft-a criminal law violation.
This is fact not a matter of opinion no matter who/or how many times you hear "theft!" re music uploading/downloading.
172 posted on 12/19/2003 10:59:49 AM PST by rastus macgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
No, it does not make me a thief. Because copying and pasting on boards is widely accepted on the net. I did think about it, and I think you're being incredibly overdramatic.
173 posted on 12/19/2003 10:59:49 AM PST by John Robertson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: kittycroft
I just read today that when searching google, there are more hits regarding hating Britney Spears than hating Saddam Hussein. (2000 for Spears, 750 for Hussein)
174 posted on 12/19/2003 11:00:13 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Per US copyright law, all creations are protected under common law copyright at the moment of creation. This protection stands for a number of years even if formal copyright is not applied for. So yeah, to answer your question, I'm right.
175 posted on 12/19/2003 11:02:16 AM PST by John Robertson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
I honestly thing that copyright infringement should only apply to people making profit from the copyrighted work. If you aren't reselling the copyrighted product, it should be considered fair use. That would be simple enough for anyone to understand and I think it would be fair.
176 posted on 12/19/2003 11:03:05 AM PST by honeygrl (If I had a dollar for every time I had 60 cents, I would be in Canada.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
Coupling isn't music. It's a TV show on BBC. Does the RIAA control TV shows on BBC too?

Oops. Of course not. The BBC would be the rights holder then.

177 posted on 12/19/2003 11:04:07 AM PST by Grit (http://www.NRSC.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
No, it does not make me a thief. Because copying and pasting on boards is widely accepted on the net. I did think about it, and I think you're being incredibly overdramatic.

And I think you're being incredibly condescending. "Widely accepted"? So that makes it OK? Hmmmmmm, interesting.

178 posted on 12/19/2003 11:04:54 AM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
Copyright violation is a matter of civil-not criminal-law.
That means downloaders aren't thieves but you are a dumbass.
179 posted on 12/19/2003 11:04:55 AM PST by rastus macgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
Recording a copyrighted television show and keeping it on tape or DVD is fair use

Remember they tried to stop even that. We have only Sony and Mr. Rodgers to thank for this aspect of fair use.

180 posted on 12/19/2003 11:05:13 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson