Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rit

I wondered how long it would take for this to happen. The DCMA had essentially given private corporations, and even individuals, subpoena power... with almost zero judicial oversight. That's not a slippery slope we should be going down.

Let the RIAA convince a judge that they have probable cause before we let them compel ISPs to expend resources, and have the RIAA go fishing in privacy data.

To my knowledge Michael Jackson never did this, but think about it: under the DCMA, Michael Jackson had the right, as a copyright holder, to subpoena the name and address of your 11-year-old son, basically on Jackson's say-so that your son has certain music on a computer. No judge need even look at it. Was that something America needed?


66 posted on 12/19/2003 8:41:33 AM PST by Nick Danger (With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nick Danger
I agree with you in that RIAA's strategy was flawed from the onset. I am disappointed that the courts did not want to touch verizon's position on the DMCA.
72 posted on 12/19/2003 8:54:56 AM PST by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson