Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago panhandlers get $99,000 settlement, Lawyers get $375,000
AP ^ | 12/20/03 | ASSOCIATED PRESS

Posted on 12/22/2003 7:31:18 AM PST by Pikamax

Saturday, December 20, 2003 4:16PM EST

Chicago panhandlers get $99,000 settlement

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CHICAGO (AP) - A federal judge has approved a $99,000 settlement for people who have been arrested or ticketed for panhandling in Chicago. The city also must pay $375,000 to cover attorneys' fees and the cost of distributing the money, said plaintiffs' lawyer Mark Weinberg, who filed suit over the matter in 2001. Judge Nan R. Nolan approved the settlement Friday. Under its terms, those arrested for panhandling in the past four years can file a claim of $400, while those ticketed can receive $50.

A tentative settlement was reached in October, as part of a battle over a 1991 ordinance that classified panhandling as disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500.

The ordinance was repealed last year. City officials have said such a blanket ban on panhandling is considered a limit on commercial speech.

Because of a two-year statute of limitations on civil cases, only those arrested or ticketed after Sept. 6, 1999, are eligible to receive money.

Claims can be made through Feb. 10.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fees; freespeech; lawsuit; lawyers; panhandling

1 posted on 12/22/2003 7:31:19 AM PST by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
And what does the harassed public get? I still remember the aggressive panhandler in Washington DC who spit on me when I walked past and didn't give him anything.
2 posted on 12/22/2003 7:34:00 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
"Panhandlers Apply to Law School:
Far More Profitable than Begging, Says One"
3 posted on 12/22/2003 7:35:55 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
What's wrong with this picture?
4 posted on 12/22/2003 7:41:35 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
More welfare for lawyers.
5 posted on 12/22/2003 7:41:43 AM PST by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
Did you spit back?
6 posted on 12/22/2003 7:41:58 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
And what does the harassed public get? I still remember the aggressive panhandler in Washington DC who spit on me when I walked past and didn't give him anything.

Apparently you didn't understand it's the panhandler's right to "demand" support and you were wrong to deny him his income - not!

Panhandlers here in "flyover country" are less sure of themselves and their rights. Also, we have concealed-carry and the panhandlers know they just might offend (threaten) the wrong person. Amazing what a difference CCW makes on the street.

7 posted on 12/22/2003 7:46:03 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
There was a lawyer in town here who negotiated a contract with the County on behalf of a farmer. The county was going to put a landfill on the property. After everything was signed, it was found that the very complicated formula for compensation of the lawyer (which he wrote into it) gave him about $1.40 for every $1.00 that the owners of the property got. The owners went to court to stop this and lost.
8 posted on 12/22/2003 8:36:37 AM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson