Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RogerFGay
We need to eliminate the whole concept of "child support". No adult should be forced to support a child who doesn't live with him/her. And no father should be expected to contribute to the support of biological child unless he was either married to the mother at the time of conception or signed a contract agreeing to provide support. Women would be a lot more careful who they had babies by, if they weren't relying on "the government will make him pay".
5 posted on 12/25/2003 7:05:37 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
And no father should be expected to contribute to the support of biological child unless he was either married to the mother at the time of conception or signed a contract agreeing to provide support.

I would add:

"Women who have claimed in court or in birth certificates that a man is the father when he is not, shall be prosecuted for perjury.

"A women who convinces a man he is the biological father of a child when later tests show he is not, shall be further charged with fraud and grand larceny if the amount of the support is greater than $5,000 ."

6 posted on 12/25/2003 7:23:44 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Here's one that'll blow your mind.

Father ordered to pay 15 years back support
7 posted on 12/25/2003 7:32:38 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson