Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Trip - questions and answers (How widely accepted is the theory that we can travel in time?)
BBC ^ | Friday, December 26, 2003 | BBC

Posted on 12/25/2003 8:12:15 PM PST by Momaw Nadon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Reaganwuzthebest
Nothing beats the cold war Trek. No counselors on board, no PC crap, no huge moral dilemmas at every turn.
81 posted on 12/26/2003 10:53:33 AM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Drango
I already posted this article tomorrow.
LOL and I've already read it...

my time machine must be stuck I keep seeing the same thing over and over again.
maybe if I kick it......wait I just did that ........oh no I'm stuck in the middle

82 posted on 12/26/2003 11:00:03 AM PST by Gone_Postal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
Nothing beats the cold war Trek. No counselors on board, no PC crap, no huge moral dilemmas at every turn.

And the stories and acting were excellent.

83 posted on 12/26/2003 11:04:03 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
The Law of conservation of mass and energy has not been broken...on a universal level energy and mass are neither created nor destroyed...you may have moved it about, but you have not created anything...
84 posted on 01/09/2004 6:56:10 AM PST by Elendil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Dean Koontz wrote a novel some years back called LIGHTNING. Basically, the story was that the NAZIs discovered time travel. But due to certain unknown laws, you could travel back in time but only forward. One of the scientists that enabled the project to work, travels forward to ensure the survivial at different times of a certain female. Interesting concept.
85 posted on 01/09/2004 7:15:23 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greydog
"Anybody heard where Paul Lezaro is?"

He's scheduled to be in Philadelphia for the Packers game.

86 posted on 01/09/2004 7:26:51 AM PST by truthandjustice1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
This is such a cool thread. So many possibilities from so many stories that we have read and seen.

The Back To The Future movies were great. It discussed alternate time lines, alternate worlds. The Terminator, which at first seemed like just an action flick, was actually a great science fiction story discussing time travel. The Quantam Leap television series was very good and often poignant. I remember reading a sci-fi story - I believe by Joseph W. Campbell - that discussed looking into time. But the further ahead you looked the blurrier it got because of the different things that could happen from simple yes/no decisions. I read another sci-fi story years ago called Night Eyes. It seemed to be about alien abductions but what it turned out to be was that the 'aliens' were actually humans from the far future. They 'abducted' people from the same family line in order to stop an event that evolved them into the 'grays.' Does anyone remember the television program The Time Travelers from the sixties?

87 posted on 01/09/2004 7:30:33 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Interesting post bump to the top.

88 posted on 01/09/2004 7:37:37 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
As long as we are talking about time travel, who remembers the Fantastic Four. Remember in the beginning of the comic, Doctor Doom invented a time machine. Then, in a later issue, he met the Emporer Kang. Kang explained to him that in the far future, he discovered a time machine in the ruins of a building that belonged to an ancestor of his from the past. Kang and Doom always thought they were either one and the same or related. This theory went on for several years until John Byrne did an excellent story concerning Reed Richards and his dad. He stated that he was missing parts of his memory after an encounter with some being and he and his family went to his dad's old place. Where they discovered a time machine that his dad invented years before Doom invented his. They went into a alternate future where Reed's dad was the ruler but basically being led by the nose of a power hungry wife. When they cleared all that up and went back to their past, the story continued with many centuries later, the future relative of Reed's dad in that alternate future discovers the time machine that Reed's dad invented and used it to become Kang. So, instead of Kang being connected to Doctor Doom, he is actually future kin of Reed Richards.
89 posted on 01/09/2004 7:46:52 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"And the stories and acting were excellent"

Almost as good as the special effects? :)

The big styrofoam rocks and other shortcomings, and the sorta old-fashioned look of old Trek used to bother me, although I loved it when I was younger, after getting used to the polished look of ST:TNG. Now when I watch the old trek, though, there just seems to be something much more "raw" about it. Maybe it's just because it's been so long since I've seen a lot of the old episodes, and I've seen too many of the ST:TNG episodes too many times.
90 posted on 01/09/2004 7:47:33 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: 7thson
Does anyone remember the television program The Time Travelers from the sixties?

There was also another one I remember... The Time Tunnel. What a great show that was, but it was only on a year or so. And I believe Lost in Space did a time travel episode or two.

There's something about those old 60's shows that are unlike anything ever done since.

91 posted on 01/09/2004 1:34:41 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
Now when I watch the old trek, though, there just seems to be something much more "raw" about it. Maybe it's just because it's been so long since I've seen a lot of the old episodes, and I've seen too many of the ST:TNG episodes too many times.

Have to agree with you there, the special effects were cheesy, even for the late 60s making the show dated. But that's what almost draws me to it more than anything, the simplicity of it combined with well-written stories.

The sci-fi shows of today have gone too far the other way for my tastes and now it's spectacular effects with boring, recycled scripts.

92 posted on 01/09/2004 1:43:42 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson