[AbsoluteJustice]

"This fabricated "fact" of yours is not proven, yet AGAIN you falsly assert it as fact. You don't seem to be capable of learning. Even the simple 2 lines of reasoning you posted is not necessarily true in every case, anyhow. "

Not prooven!!???
So I guess it also not prooven that the drug abuser checked himself in to a clinic because he was not abusing drugs?
Huh?
He admitted right on the air he was abusing prescrition medication. This is a crime. This is not subject to disupte. This is a fact not realitvism reasoning.

"The method of getting Rush's records may have violated the 4th amendment, and Florida's right to privacy law. Which is why you are wrong again on your assertion:"

Two judges have not seen it this way. So in your point of view because an unpopular decision has been rendered against a person you like it is not just? what will it take 10 Judges? SCOTUS? What if they side with the prosecution will you still say it is unjust?

[HighWheeler]

You know, it's getting tiring for me to have to constantly correct you in a vain attempt to educate you.

Read this:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1046116/posts