Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rocket interrupts Stryker’s peaceful holiday patrol
Army Times ^ | December 26, 2003 | Matthew Cox

Posted on 12/26/2003 1:28:20 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

Edited on 05/07/2004 10:06:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Those video are from video advertisements of russian company Rossvooruzhenie (means Russian Armament). They sell weaponry to foreign countries.
http://www.rosvoorouzhenie.ru/video/video.htm ..
21 posted on 12/26/2003 9:27:34 PM PST by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Fate Of Stryker, Army's New Combat Vehicle, Will Be Set In Iraq

Scroll down to Post 112

22 posted on 12/26/2003 9:42:55 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Old soldiers never die. They just go to the Class VI Store parking lot and regroup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan
Lightning Strikes Twice
23 posted on 12/26/2003 9:50:01 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Old soldiers never die. They just go to the Class VI Store parking lot and regroup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Thank it is interesting. Stryker costs 3 mln dollars? I red somewhere in Runet that BTR-90 costs something near 100-150 grands. 20 times less. Russian army has tens thousands of BTR-80s now and hundreds of BTR-90. Even american economy will feel weight if US decides to match its amount with Strykers.
24 posted on 12/26/2003 10:04:20 PM PST by RusIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Thanks for the pics Cannoneer No. 4!
25 posted on 12/26/2003 11:55:17 PM PST by 2111USMC (the few, the proud, The Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The pace of the around-the-clock operation continues to be relentless...

And the troops are accomplishing so much!


26 posted on 12/27/2003 1:07:20 AM PST by radu (May God watch over our troops and keep them safe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
27 posted on 12/27/2003 1:17:58 AM PST by windchime (Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Can't wait until they are at a dealer near us all! lol

I'd buy one! Can't find a parking space? See a guy illegally taking up two? < BAM > he he he
28 posted on 12/27/2003 1:22:28 AM PST by Fledermaus (Just to help out all of you morons on the left - an Orange Alert doesn't mean stockpiling juice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Be Well ~ Be Armed ~ Be Safe ~ Molon Labe!
29 posted on 12/27/2003 7:14:02 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
30 posted on 12/27/2003 8:12:08 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: archy
ping to posts 19, 20, 21, 22 and 24.
31 posted on 12/27/2003 1:14:19 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Old soldiers never die. They just go to the Class VI Store parking lot and regroup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RusIvan; RussianConservative
The predecesors of Stryker. What is different?

Immediate difference? BTR 80 and 90 are much better armed, and have firing positions, including forward firing points, for the passengers inside, unlike Stryker. The original first and second generation BTR 60 and BTR70 wheeled personnel carriers have had their twin gasoline engines replaced with a more powerful and safer Diesel type, and many of the faults and failings found in the first generations of machines have now been corrected or at least improved in the later models- side exits for troops, should the vehicle turn on one side or upside-down, for instance, as killed three Stryker crewmen so far.

Stryker's 40mm grenade launcher system was found to be wildly inaccurate during testfirings in the USA, and live weapons shooting with it was ordeerd halted; once in Iraq, some of the first US casualties aboard a Stryker occurred when a 40mm round fired while the crew was mounting a Mark 19 grenade launcher on the remote weapons mount of a Stryker. The Russian equivalent, 30mm AGS-17 Plamya is battle tested in Chechnya and Afghanistan, and is much safer; the 30mm gun fitted aboard BTR 80 and 90, especially on the new Kliver turret with twin Kornet antitank missile launchers, is even better, and longer ranged.

Going to a war like in Iraq? Send me in a BTR90, any day. But better, an MTLV tracked personnel carrier. Wonderful machine.

I think the BTR vehicles captured from Iraqis were BTR- 70s. Good thing for the Strykers that they got there after the combat had ended, I don't think the 14.5mm automatic gun aboard even the older BTR-70 wiould have had trouble penetrating Stryker's half-inch/13mm armor.

Oh, and BTR 70 is amphibious, of course, probably not a big deal in Iraq. And it also can be air transported or airdroppped; Stryker cannot.

So BTR 80 and 90 are not predecessors of Stryker, but alternates whose performance Stryker cannot match. Predecessor vehicles for Stryker were WWII-era M8 and M20 *Greyhound* 6-wheeled armoured cars built by Ford.


32 posted on 12/27/2003 2:21:52 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: archy; centurion316; Proud Legions
Thanks, archy. It kind of gripes me when a Russian asks me why the US Army bought Strykers when the Russians would be happy to sell us BTR-90's and I can't give him a good answer. Not Invented Here doesn't even work. Stryker came from Canada by way of Switzerland.

How hard would it be to mount all that combat internet and email and Blue Force Tracker electronics into a BTR-90?

It is cruel to tell motorized rifle types “Damn, that Stryker looks like a BTR!” — particularly when main gun rounds are being uploaded.

33 posted on 12/27/2003 4:29:28 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (It is cruel to tell motorized rifle types “Damn, that Stryker looks like a BTR!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
How hard would it be to mount all that combat internet and email and Blue Force Tracker electronics into a BTR-90?

Or the German 8-wheel Fuchs, as used for a CBR recon vehicle, also an 8-wheeler. I'm not sure if the BTR-90 has a 24-volt electrical system, but that could be reworked easily enough- we might even want to pull the Russian powerpack [motor/transmission unit] and replace them with something U.S. made, not that there's anything wrong with the Russian powerplant, but for commonality of spares with our heavy trucks. We might even slip on axles from 10-ton trucks or GOERs, too.

But of course neither BTR90 nor Fuchs would be C130 transportable. No more than a Stryker is....

The Russians, wisely I think, have used a mix of 4-wheel, 6-wheel and 8-wheel armored cars, plus a variety of light [BMD and BMP] and heavier [MTLV and reworked T-55] tracked vehicles in Afghanistan and Chechnya. And the more experience they gain, the heavier the mix of the heavy tracked vehicles becomes, much like the WWII Canadian experience, beginning the war with many 4-wheeled armoured cars and light tracked Universal *Bren* Carriers, and ending it with personnel carriers built on a turretless *Ram Kangaroo* squad carriers built from the Sherman Tank chassis.

We were close to that mix of wheelies, at lerast, with the 4-wheel MP ASV, now cancelled, the improvised but brilliant 6-wheel *Alabama Slammer* M113 body/M919 truck hybrid, and the LAVIII/Stryker on the wheeled side, and the Bradley and M113 tracked. Instead we're now putting all our eggs in the Stryker basket, and it's lining somebody's pocket- somebody powerful enough that the lives lost are unimportant.

-archy-/-

34 posted on 12/28/2003 11:49:00 AM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson