The liberal and "moderate" members of the Supreme Court should be considered outlaws in the classic meaning of the term. They are not subject to the protection of the law and anyone can do anything to them.
What you assert or, heaven forbid, advocate at #33 is radicalism of the first order. Any Leninist would be proud of such expediency and lack of conservatism.
Since conservatism was named, in the time of Burke, Conservatism has stood for freedom from arbitrary power, the rule of law, equality under law, adherence to Order instead of Ideology or fanaticism and strict suspicion of license masquerading as "liberty."