[NewLand]

I agree. And, it has been men like you who have protected our freedoms for 200+ years. Thank you.

In this case, electing the POTUS, the issue is who do we want as commander in chief in times of war and terrorism.

My point is that we don't need to look beyond GWB among the choices, the choice being him or a RAT. No RAT gets his or her filthy traitorous hands on our military, ever again, not with my help at least.

I don't believe GWB threatens our freedoms as citizens. Do you?

[dcwusmc]

All things considered, I have to say that Bush IS treading all over our rights. Were he not, he would have not done 90 percent of what he HAS done. Sure, the war on terror is necessary, BUT it has brought us that abominable USA-PATRIOT act which is utterly unnecessary. It has NOT closed our borders (and my brother who lives in AZ plus a retired Marine friend who is a deputy sheriff in AZ tell me that it's common knowledge that middle easterners abound in Mexico who have been offering LOTS of money to be escorted through the border to someplace beyond the checkpoints. How many have GOTTEN here is anyone's guess.) It has NOT gotten rid of 20,000-PLUS victim disarmament laws which are ALL unconstitutional. All in all, we are burdened with more and more government and yet we have less and less safety. Hmmmm, what do YOU think?