To: Taliesan
Why can't she sue Slick for it? His evasion of the truth caused the expenditure of her attorney fees, and made her name a national joke. Sure, her conduct was responsible for having her name synonymous with a certain sex act, but if he had simply given Paula Jones an apology at an early stage, she would have never been investigated.
You've got to admit, a court fight between Monica and Slick would be way more entertaining than anything that's in the news media right now, as far as legal tales are concerned!
To: Alamo-Girl
Ping for your Clinton archives.
21 posted on
12/30/2003 10:31:39 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: hunter112
"Why can't she sue Slick for it? His evasion of the truth caused the expenditure of her attorney fees, and made her name a national joke."
Maybe she wants to remain among the living?
26 posted on
12/30/2003 11:10:37 AM PST by
LADY J
To: hunter112
I'm not saying this is gest...she can probably sue him for sexual harrassment. He was the person in charge. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but even if it's consenual, it's still deemed harrassment.
30 posted on
12/30/2003 12:05:10 PM PST by
Hildy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson