Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Taliesan
Why can't she sue Slick for it? His evasion of the truth caused the expenditure of her attorney fees, and made her name a national joke. Sure, her conduct was responsible for having her name synonymous with a certain sex act, but if he had simply given Paula Jones an apology at an early stage, she would have never been investigated.

You've got to admit, a court fight between Monica and Slick would be way more entertaining than anything that's in the news media right now, as far as legal tales are concerned!

20 posted on 12/30/2003 10:28:16 AM PST by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Ping for your Clinton archives.
21 posted on 12/30/2003 10:31:39 AM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: hunter112
"Why can't she sue Slick for it? His evasion of the truth caused the expenditure of her attorney fees, and made her name a national joke."

Maybe she wants to remain among the living?

26 posted on 12/30/2003 11:10:37 AM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: hunter112
I'm not saying this is gest...she can probably sue him for sexual harrassment. He was the person in charge. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but even if it's consenual, it's still deemed harrassment.
30 posted on 12/30/2003 12:05:10 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson