1 posted on
01/01/2004 9:19:32 AM PST by
nwrep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: *Clash of Civilizatio; *Christian list; *Christian_list; *Election President; Jim Robinson; ...
PING
2 posted on
01/01/2004 9:21:38 AM PST by
nwrep
To: nwrep
Damn,,they need to keep a low profile till he gets the nom. And this strategy is not a good one,,we need to let Dean self-immolate, and he will.
3 posted on
01/01/2004 9:22:03 AM PST by
cajungirl
(I adore the Brits!! Tony Blair is my hero!!)
To: nwrep
bttt
4 posted on
01/01/2004 9:22:22 AM PST by
lainde
(Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
To: nwrep
You know, this over-the-top rhetoric from our side doen't help. While I privately wonder about Dean, it is easier to say he is "tempermentally unsuited" to be president. That allegation is easier to prove and doesn't make us sound like wild-eyed fanatics.
To: nwrep
As for Dean's children, Murray said, "it gets worse." "The Deans told their children to pick a religion, any religion, and that they would not get involved in their decision one way or the other," Murray lamented. The two children subsequently chose to become Jewish. Jewish? How terrible! </ sarc>
6 posted on
01/01/2004 9:24:31 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: nwrep
They'll probably attack this guy and his group for being "Dean haters" (while of course in their minds it is noble to hate Bush)
7 posted on
01/01/2004 9:29:07 AM PST by
Cubs Fan
To: nwrep
Hey, I thought I just saw Dean in an old ep of Twilight Zone! (on Sci Fi's New Years Day marathon)
9 posted on
01/01/2004 9:30:31 AM PST by
Ciexyz
To: nwrep
One of my best friends growing up was Unitarian. The Mom was Jewish and the Dad was Catholic, so it was a compromise. Guess it was more socially acceptable for the kids, because the Unitarian Church was still considered a "church".
15 posted on
01/01/2004 9:37:47 AM PST by
Ciexyz
To: nwrep
Howard Dean is God's gift to George Bush in 2004.
To: nwrep
"Perhaps Howard Dean would have been better off in a Unitarian Church, but then he would have had trouble winning any elections as a member of a near atheistic institution."Wasn't Nixon Unitarian?
To: nwrep
Mentally unstable? That's politics. If changing in mid-stream is unstable - then what was Clinton?
To: nwrep
"It says something about our nation that a great political party consisting of millions of Americans could possibly pick someone as mentally unstable as Howard Dean to lead their party...First of all, the Democrat Party is not a great party. Not any longer. Once upon a time, there were elements of greatness--facing down threats, cutting taxes, protecting innocent life--but now? Give me a break. The elevation of Dean is the inevitable evolution of the Democrats.
Secondly, this is nothing new. Look at the individuals nominated by that Party since 1972--George McGovern, Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Mike Dukakis, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore. Not a worthy man among 'em--the fact that two--count 'em two were able to slip enough lies past the electorate to hold the reins of power is incredible, yes--but not at all unusual for the Democrats.
Finally, Dean's ascendancy should be greeted as good news by Republicans. Fooled by the facade of Clinton's "success", liberals now apparently believe they can fool most (or a plurality) of the people most of the time. They cannot. They'll fail miserably, and though liberalism won't die completely (we have to remember that lesson from '94) it could be sent into deep hybernation--at least politically.
38 posted on
01/01/2004 10:20:08 AM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: nwrep
Dean is a complete nut job. This is of course obvious to everyone but liberal nut jobs. Bush is a shoe in, unless he blows it over amnesty. But if that is the case you can be sure the communist media will run all kinds of reasons for his defeat other than "It's the illegals stupid".
To: nwrep
Well, yes, Dean is a nut job. But after reading this article, I have to conclude that William J. Murray is a sanctimonious idiot.
This is the absolute WORST argument not to support Dean that could possibly be made. And on top of that, Murray holds the Republicans responsible for Dean. He even invites Christian conservatives to stay home for fear that if Bush is reelected, Cheney's lesbian daughter will get married to a lesbian partner in the White House! Good grief.
52 posted on
01/01/2004 10:44:21 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: nwrep
fear the possibility of a President Howard Dean.ROTFLOL!!!!!
There's six weeks between election and inaugaration day.
Just eneough time to sell my house and move to the Bahamas.
53 posted on
01/01/2004 10:48:33 AM PST by
Rome2000
(Ban "Jihad", not smoking)
To: nwrep
Medved said it yesterday too.
56 posted on
01/01/2004 10:51:24 AM PST by
tubavil
To: nwrep
Mentally unstable? That's putting it mildly. ;-)
He'd legislate and tax us into oblivion if he had his way.
57 posted on
01/01/2004 10:52:09 AM PST by
pixmo
To: nwrep
This guy MURRAY is as bad as Dean. He's as egomaniacally
self-fascinated with his own opinions as Dean.
66 posted on
01/01/2004 11:58:07 AM PST by
Vinomori
To: nwrep
I've heard William J. Murray preach. He's the son of Madalyn Murray O'Hair. Nutcases both.
71 posted on
01/01/2004 12:41:38 PM PST by
mombonn
To: nwrep
Is there a Republican for Dean committee? I think he is the best candidate for Bush to beat
76 posted on
01/01/2004 12:55:59 PM PST by
woofie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson